Seite - 31 - in Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education

32 C.M.Stracke Greenwald, A.G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 82,1–20.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076157. Gunsalus, C. K., &Robinson, A. D. (2018). Nine pitfalls of researchmisconduct.Nature, 557, 297–299.https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05145-6. Hattie, J. A. C. (2008). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement.London&NewYork:Routledge. Hecker,B. L. (2017). Four decades of open science.Nature Physics, 13(6), 523–525. https://doi. org/10.1038/nphys4160. Henneken,E.A.,&Accomazzi,A. (2011).Linking to data: Effect on citation rates in astronomy. Retrieved fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3618. Higgins,K. (2016).Post-truth:Aguidefor theperplexed.NatureNews,540(7631).https://doi.org/ 10.1038/540009a. Horton,R. (1997).Pardonable revisionsandprotocol reviews.The Lancet, 349,6. Inter-UniversityConsortiumforPoliticalandSocialResearch.(2012).Guidetosocialsciencedata preparationandarchiving:Bestpractice throughout thedata lifecycle (5thed).AnnArbor,MI: Author.Retrieved fromhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/files/deposit/dataprep.pdf. Ioannidis,J.P.(2012).Whyscienceisnotnecessarilyself-correcting.PerspectivesonPsychological Science,7,645–654.https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464056. John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable researchpracticeswith incentives for truth telling.Psychological Science, 23,524–532. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953. Juran, J.M. (Ed.). (1951).Quality control handbook.NewYork:McGraw-Hill. Juran, J.M. (1992).Juranonqualitybydesign.Thenewsteps forplanningquality intogoodsand services.NewYork:FreePress. Kagan, J. (2009).The three cultures: Natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century.NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress. Kidwell,M.C., Lazarevic´, L. B., Baranski, E.,Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., et al. (2016).Badges toacknowledgeopenpractices:Asimple, lowcost, effectivemethodfor increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio. 1002456. Klein,R.A.,Ratliff,K.A.,Vianello,M.,Adams,R.B.,Bahnik,Š.,Bernstein,M.J., et al. (2014). Investigatingvariation in replicability.Social Psychology, 45,142–152.https://doi.org/10.1027/ 1864-9335/a000178. Kraker,P.,Leony,D.,Reinhardt,W.,&Beham,G.(2011).Thecaseforanopenscienceintechnology enhanced learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(6), 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2011.045454. Kronick,D.A.(1976).Ahistoryofscientific&technicalperiodicals:Theoriginsanddevelopment of the scientificand technicalpress, 1665–1790.Metuchen,NJ:ScarecrowPress. Kuhn,T.S. (1962).The structureof scientific revolutions.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress. Lakens,D.,Adolfi, F.G.,Albers,C. J.,Anvari, F.,Apps,M.A. J.,Argamon,S.E.,…Zwaan,R. A. (2017,September18). Justifyyour alpha.PsyArXiv [pre-print]. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf. io/9s3y6. TheLancet. (2015).Protocol reviewatTheLancet:1997–2015.TheLancet,386, 2456–2457. Lasthiotakis,H.,Kretz,A.,&Sá,C. (2015).Open science strategies in researchpolicies:Acom- parativeexplorationofCanada, theUSandtheUK.PolicyFuturesinEducation,13(8),968–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315579983. LeBel,E.P.,McCarthy,R.,Earp,B.D.,Elson,M.,&Vanpaemel,W.(2018).Aunifiedframeworkto quantifythecredibilityofscientificfindings.AdvancesinMethodsandPracticesinPsychological Science,1(3), 389–402.https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489. Levenstein,M.C.,&Lyle,J.A.(2018).Data:Sharingiscaring.AdvancesinMethodsandPractices inPsychological Science,1,95–103.https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918758319.