Seite - 32 - in Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education

2 OpenScienceandRadicalSolutions forDiversity,Equity… 33 Lin, T. (2012). Cracking open the scientific process. The New York Times, 16 January. RetrievedNovember8,2019, fromhttps://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/science/open-science- challenges-journal-tradition-with-web-collaboration.html. Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, universalism and disinterestedness: Re- examining contemporary support among academics forMerton’s scientific norms. Journal of AcademicEthics, 6(1), 67–78.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y. Makel,M.C.,&Plucker, J.A. (Eds.). (2017).Towardamoreperfectpsychology: Improving trust, accuracy,and transparency inresearch.Washington,DC:AmericanPsychologicalAssociation. Markoff, J. (2005).What the dormouse said: How the sixties counterculture shaped the personal computer industry.NewYork:Viking. McBee, M. T., Makel, M. C., Peters, S. J., & Matthews, M. S. (2018). A call for open sci- ence in giftedness research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0016986218784178. McKiernan,E.C.,Bourne,P.E.,Brown,C.T.,Buck,S.,Kenall,A.,Lin, J.,…Yarkoni,T. (2016). Pointofview:Howopensciencehelps researchers succeed.Elife,5, e16800.https://doi.org/10. 7554/elife.16800. McShane, B. B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C., & Tackett, J. L. (2017). Abandon statistical significance.The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305. 2018.1527253. Merton,R.K.(1973).Thesociologyofscience:Theoreticalandempirical investigations.Chicago: UniversityofChicagoPress. Merton,R.K. (1996).On social structureand science.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress. Meyer,M.N. (2018).Practical tips forethicaldata sharing.Advances inMethodsandPractices in PsychologicalScience,1,131–144.https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747656. Miguel,E.,Camerer,C.,Casey,K.,Cohen,J.,Esterling,K.M.,Gerber,A.,etal. (2014).Promoting transparency in social science research. Science, 343, 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1245317. Mirowski, P. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086. Mitroff, I. I. (1974).Normsandcounter-norms in a select groupof theApollomoon scientists:A casestudyof theambivalenceof scientists.AmericanSociologicalReview,39,579–595.https:// doi.org/10.2307/2094423. Molloy, J. C. (2011). The open knowledge foundation: Open data means better science. PLoS Biology,9(12), e1001195.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195. Mondada, F. (2017).Can robotics helpmove researchers toward open science? [From theField]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 24(1), 111–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016. 2646118. Munafo,M.R.,Nosek,B.A.,Bishop,D.V.M.,Button,K.S.,Chambers,C.D.,Percie,duSert,N., …&Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2017).Amanifestofor reproduciblescience.NatureHumanBehaviour, 1(1), 0021.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021. Murray-Rust,P.(2008).Opendatainscience.SerialsReview,34(1),52–64.https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.serrev.2008.01.001. Muster,S. (2018).Arcticfreshwater—Acommonsrequiresopenscience. InArcticsummercollege yearbook (pp.107–120).NewYork,NY:Springer. Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 23,217–243.https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215. Nosek,B.A.,&Errington, T.M. (2017).Making sense of replications.ELife, 6, e23383. https:// doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23383. Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/ a000192.