Seite - 169 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Bild der Seite - 169 -
Text der Seite - 169 -
Energies2018,11, 2038
Inordertocomparetheaccuracyforthedifferenttypesofday, thedaysofthetestdata(2016)were
dividedintwogroups: specialdays,which includeweekends,August (officialacademicholidays),
andalldays thataredeterminedbythedummyvariablesFH1, . . . , FH5inTable2;and, regulardays,
which include therestof thedays. Resultsareexposed inTable7.Notice that the lowestMAPEscores
arealwaysreachedforregulardays.
Table7.MAPE(%)for regularandspecialdays in2016.
Pred.Horizon=48h Bagging RForest CForest XGBoost
MAPEregulardays (149) 9.07 8.60 10.44 8.15
MAPEspecialdays (217) 9.97 9.83 11.08 9.57
MAPEtotaldays (366) 9.60 9.33 10.82 8.99
Figure1a,b showthemonthly evolutionof twogoodness-of-fitmeasures (RMSEandMAPE).
Remark that accuracies of random forest andXGBoost are quite similar,with greatest differences
in January andMarch (due to lackof accuracy inChristmas andEasterndays). Also, themodels
fitbetter fornighthours (from10p.m. to5a.m.) due to theabsenceof activityduring thatperiod
(seeFigure2a,b).
Figure1.Goodness-of-fitmeasures foreachmonth in2016andeachensemblemethod: (a)usingroot
meansquareerror (RMSE) (kWh);and, (b)usingmeanabsolutepercentageerror (MAPE) (%).
Figure2.Goodness-of-fitmeasures foreachensemblemethodbyhourof theday in2016: (a)using
RMSE(kWh); (b)usingMAPE(%).
Asanexample,Figure3showstheactualandprediction loadforacompleteweek inMay2016.
169
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Titel
- Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Autoren
- Wei-Chiang Hong
- Ming-Wei Li
- Guo-Feng Fan
- Herausgeber
- MDPI
- Ort
- Basel
- Datum
- 2019
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-03897-583-0
- Abmessungen
- 17.0 x 24.4 cm
- Seiten
- 448
- Schlagwörter
- Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
- Kategorie
- Informatik