Seite - 117 - in VULNERABLE - The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
Bild der Seite - 117 -
Text der Seite - 117 -
117Resisting
the Siren’s Call: Emergency Powers, Federalism, and Public Policy
new social programs at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars.1 And
yet, unlike the provinces, the federal government has not declared a
national emergency. Nor has it triggered the federal EmergenciesÂ
Act.2
To some, including Colleen M. Flood and Bryan Thomas in
Chapter A-6 of this volume, that suggests fundamental flaws in the
Emergencies Act.3 Others have called out the government for shirking
its duty.4 There are demands for it to do more.
In this chapter, I take a somewhat different approach, focusing
on the specific ability to enact laws under the emergency branch of
the “peace, order, and good government” power (POGG).5 Examining
three policy areas, I examine the benefits and drawbacks of possible
emergency legislation. While such laws might provide a measure of
assistance, they come with certain risks—risks that are heightened
during a health pandemic requiring extensive inter-governmental
cooperation.6
The POGG Emergency Power
The Constitution Act, 1867 enumerates federal and provincial powers.
Traditionally, provinces have jealously guarded their powers against
federal encroachment. Early cases circumscribed federal authority,
under s. 91, to “make laws for the peace, order and good government
of Canada.”7 For years, national emergencies were thought to be the
1. Government of Canada, Canada’s Economic Response to COVID-19 (Ottawa:
Government of Canada, 2020), online: Government of Canada <https://www.can-
ada.ca/en/department-finance/economic-response-plan.html>.
2. Emergencies Act, RSC, 1985, c 22 (4th Supp).
3. See Colleen M Flood & Bryan Thomas, this volume, Chapter A-6; and “Liberty
v. Security in a Pandemic”, TVO The Agenda (2 April 2020), online: <https://
www.tvo.org/video/liberty-vs-security-in-a-pandemic?utm_source=TVO&utm_
campaign=2031b263c3-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_1_17_2019_10_56_COPY_
01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_eadf6a4c78-2031b263c3-
24183137>.
4. Christopher Guly, “Is it Time to Invoke the Federal Emergencies Act?”, The
Tyee (27 March 2020), online: <https://thetyee.ca/News/2020/03/27/Time-For-
Emergencies-Act/>.
5. Constitution Act, 1867 (UK), 30 & 31 Vict, c 3, s 91, reprinted in RSC 1985,
Appendix II, No 5 [ConstitutionÂ
Act,Â
1867]. The POGG power has three “branches”:
new matters, national concern, and emergencies. While both national concern
and emergency involve incursions into provincial jurisdiction, the emergency
branch has the greatest relevance to a global health pandemic.
6. See David Robitaille, this volume, Chapter A-4.
7. Constitution Act, 1867, supra note 5.
VULNERABLE
The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Titel
- VULNERABLE
- Untertitel
- The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Autoren
- Vanessa MacDonnell
- Jane Philpott
- Sophie Thériault
- Sridhar Venkatapuram
- Verlag
- Ottawa Press
- Datum
- 2020
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9780776636429
- Abmessungen
- 15.2 x 22.8 cm
- Seiten
- 648
- Kategorien
- Coronavirus
- International