Seite - 441 - in VULNERABLE - The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
Bild der Seite - 441 -
Text der Seite - 441 -
441Weighing
Public Health and Mental Health Responses to Non-Compliance…
The harm feared must be likely to occur; it does not need to be certain,
but it must be probable rather than merely possible.19 When a person
who is uninfected fails to comply with public health directives related
to COVID-19 as a result of mental illness, it seems unlikely that their
risk of infection would be sufficiently likely in most cases to meet the
standard for involuntary hospitalization. Even if a person is homeless
and faces expulsion from a shelter for failure to comply with public
health measures, that factor alone is unlikely to meet the standard
of likely serious physical impairment, particularly if the person has
managed on the streets in the past. The standard might be met, how-
ever, where a person is elderly or has major medical comorbidities.
Another relevant example is offered by the case of Re KP, which
involved a woman who was involved in risky work (such as sex
work) and held delusional beliefs that she could put curses on people
and that she had the power to cure and cause plagues like SARS and
West Nile Virus. The Board evaluating her case concluded that seri-
ous physical impairment was likely on the basis of her provocative
behaviour and because “her belief that she has special powers could
likely lead her to behave dangerously.”20 Other more general delu-
sions regarding invulnerability have been accepted as posing a risk of
serious physical impairment because of the high probability of risky
behaviour.21 So it is possible—depending upon the specific behav-
iour—that delusions related to invulnerability to infection might also
impair a person’s ability to respond properly to public health advice
about COVID-19, and could meet the criteria of likelihood of serious
physical impairment if that person was at risk of serious illness.
The criterion of “substantial mental or physical deterioration”
allows for earlier intervention before a person has deteriorated to the
point where serious bodily harm or physical impairment is likely.
This criterion applies only to the subset of people who are incapable,
who have a history of treatable mental disorder, and for whom sub-
stitute consent to treatment has been given.22 It is possible that the risk
of infection with the virus might, together with other factors, satisfy
the lower threshold of “substantial deterioration” and allow for the
hospitalization and treatment of the incapable person with a treatable
condition who is not following public health directives.
19. See e.g. DE (Re), 2003 CanLII 54880 (ONCCB).
20. KP (Re), 2003 CanLII 28021 (ONCCB).
21. KR (Re), 2013 CanLII 86463 (ONCCB).
22. Thompson, supra note 2 at para 35.
VULNERABLE
The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Titel
- VULNERABLE
- Untertitel
- The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Autoren
- Vanessa MacDonnell
- Jane Philpott
- Sophie Thériault
- Sridhar Venkatapuram
- Verlag
- Ottawa Press
- Datum
- 2020
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9780776636429
- Abmessungen
- 15.2 x 22.8 cm
- Seiten
- 648
- Kategorien
- Coronavirus
- International