Seite - 535 - in VULNERABLE - The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
Bild der Seite - 535 -
Text der Seite - 535 -
535The
Plausibility and Resolvability of Legal Claims Against China and WHO under…
drawn from law, rather than the less efficient tit-for-tats that charac-
terize feuds between antagonistic great powers and, less frequently,
international organizations. The factual and legal analysis provided
herein is dependent upon facts still being reported and revised.
Nevertheless, the chapter is a roadmap to reconsideration of some of
the IHR (2005)’s functions and a guide to the legality of actions and
measures taken by major actors over the course of a rapidly unfold-
ing pandemic.
The process leading to the International Health Regulations
(2005) was facilitated by recognition at the highest national and inter-
national organizational levels that infectious diseases posed a threat
to global security, a threat of sufficient magnitude to implicate the
United Nations Security Council’s authority under the UN Charter.
The 1980s witnessed the emergence and increase in the incidence of
viral hemorrhagic fevers and HIV. By 1995, the number of people in
Africa living with HIV/AIDS rose dramatically, accounting for the
vast majority of people living with HIV/AIDS globally.2
In response, the World Health Assembly adopted resolutions
charging the WHO Director-General with identifying new responses
to new and re-emerging infectious diseases, because the existing
International Health Regulations did not address novel infectious
agents and failed to provide for an adequate response to those that
were covered.3 In 2000, the UN Security Council recognized infectious
disease as an international peace and security issue.4 Between 2000
and 2002, negotiations for a revised IHR languished at WHO.
In late 2002, an epidemic of atypical pneumonia erupted in
China’s Guangdong Province. China failed to disclose to WHO
the emergence of the disease that would later become known as
SARS until a doctor who had treated patients in Guangdong devel-
oped symptoms while in Hong Kong. The pathogen infected hotel
guests, patients, and contacts in Hong Kong, Vietnam, Singapore,
and Canada. Because SARS was not a notifiable disease under the
IHR as they then existed, China had no legal obligation to report
2. Jonathan M Mann & Daniel JM Tarantola, eds, AIDS in the World II: GlobalÂ
Dimensions, Social Roots, and Reponses (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
3. World Health Organization, “Strengthening Health Security by Implementing
the International Health Regulations (2005)” (2005), online: World HealthÂ
OrganizationÂ
<http://www.who.int/ihr/revisionprocess/revision/en/index.html>.
4. Alex de Waal, “HIV/AIDS and the Challenges of Security and Conflict” (2010)
375:9708 The Lancet 22.
VULNERABLE
The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Titel
- VULNERABLE
- Untertitel
- The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Autoren
- Vanessa MacDonnell
- Jane Philpott
- Sophie Thériault
- Sridhar Venkatapuram
- Verlag
- Ottawa Press
- Datum
- 2020
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9780776636429
- Abmessungen
- 15.2 x 22.8 cm
- Seiten
- 648
- Kategorien
- Coronavirus
- International