Seite - 560 - in VULNERABLE - The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
Bild der Seite - 560 -
Text der Seite - 560 -
VULNERABLE560
rights obligations when they unfairly discriminate against those who
appear to be from the most affected countries. As described by Jamie
Liew in Chapter D-7 of this book, these travel restrictions may be
more about pacifying fears of racialized persons, reinforcing racism
and xenophobia, than anything else.
Total Border Closures Are Possibly Legal But Probably Illegal
While it is clear that targeted border closures are illegal under the
International Health Regulations, more uncertain is the international
legal status of total border closures that have been enacted by at least
113 countries, including Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Russia,
and South Africa.11 Whereas targeted border closures limit travel from
particular countries perceived as high-risk, total border closures ban
inbound travellers from all countries.
At first glance, many people might understand total border clo-
sures to be even more restrictive than targeted border closures and
as such assume that they would be just as illegal under Article 43 of
the International Health Regulations. Yet the purpose of the Article 43
limitations on travel restrictions was to avoid unnecessarily amplify-
ing the economic and social consequences of public health risks in
affected countries, and to avoid disincentivizing all countries from
reporting risks when they appear. Indeed, countries are naturally less
likely to report a new infectious disease outbreak in their jurisdic-
tion if they are worried about facing targeted border closures that do
not typically work anyway. But total border closures do not primar-
ily or only punish specific affected countries; rather, most costs from
total border closures are endured by the citizens and economies of
the country that enacts them. Because of that dynamic, total border
closures were neither anticipated nor specified by the International
Health Regulations. Indeed, the 196 countries that are parties to the
instrument may not have intended to prevent total border closures if
a time came when such closures were desired.
Even if this purposive interpretive argument does not pass muster,
countries enacting total border closures could still point to the absence
of opposing scientific evidence as a rationale in defence. Thereby, they
can skirt the first condition on additional health measures imposed by
11. Our World in Data, “International Travel Controls During the COVID-19
Pandemic” (last visited 25 May 2020), online: Our World in Data <https://our-
worldindata.org/grapher/international-travel-covid>.
VULNERABLE
The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Titel
- VULNERABLE
- Untertitel
- The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Autoren
- Vanessa MacDonnell
- Jane Philpott
- Sophie Thériault
- Sridhar Venkatapuram
- Verlag
- Ottawa Press
- Datum
- 2020
- Sprache
- englisch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9780776636429
- Abmessungen
- 15.2 x 22.8 cm
- Seiten
- 648
- Kategorien
- Coronavirus
- International