Web-Books
im Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Seite - 160 -
  • Benutzer
  • Version
    • Vollversion
    • Textversion
  • Sprache
    • Deutsch
    • English - Englisch

Seite - 160 - in Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

Bild der Seite - 160 -

Bild der Seite - 160 - in Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

Text der Seite - 160 -

Algorithms 2018,11, 57 Havingcalculatedoptimalsolutionsforseveralpoints, it ispossible tovalidate thedecisiontouse eitherdynamicorheuristicplanningalgorithms. InFigure4, therelativesolutionqualitygainedby theoptimalcontrolalgorithmDYNisassumedtobe100%.Therelativequality indexof theheuristic solutions is calculated as a fraction of the optimal one, i.e., it can be observed that, in the case of anumberofprocessesbetween10and12, thequalityof theheuristicandoptimalsolutionsdoesnot differ bymore than4%. In area 2, theDYNalgorithm ispreferable to theheuristics. If still using theheuristics, theFIFOalgorithmispreferable to theLast-in-first-outone. The largestbenefit from using theDYNalgorithmisachieved inarea3. In thisarea, theLIFOalgorithmispreferable to the FIFOalgorithm. Finally, theproposedmodelandalgorithmallowsfor theachievementofbetter results inmany cases in comparisonwith heuristics algorithms. However, this point is not themost important. Themost importantpoint is that thisapproachallows the interlinkingofplanningandscheduling modelswithinanadaptationframework. Therefore, thesuggestedresultsareimportant intheIndustry 4.0domain.Hence, theproposedmodelingcomplexdoesnotexistasa“thing in itself”butworks in the integrateddecision-supportsystemandguides theplanningandschedulingdecisions indynamics ontheprinciplesofoptimizationandadaptation. 6.Conclusions Optimalcontrolsas functionsof thesystemandcontrol stateallowfor thegenerationofoptimal decisions in consideration of a system’s evolution in time in thepresence of perturbationswhich result indifferent systemstates.Optimalcontrolapproaches takeanotherperspectiveasmathematical programmingmethodswhichrepresentschedulesas trajectories. Computationalalgorithmswithregardtostate, control, andconjunctivevariablespacesexist in the literature.Wehavedemonstrated that theadvantagesofoptimalcontrolmethodsareapplicable to the treatmentof largescaleproblemswithcomplexconstraints, theconsiderationofnon-stationary process executiondynamics, the representation indifferential equations of complex interrelations betweenprocessexecution,capacityevolution,andmachinesetups. Inaddition, theadvantagesof optimal control also includeaccuracyof continuous timeandaccuratepresentationof continuous flows(e.g., inprocess industryorenergysystems)with thehelpofcontinuousstatevariables. An important observation is that schedule presentation in terms of optimal controlmakes it possible to incorporate therichvarietyofcontrol theoreticaxiomswithregardto feedbackadaptive control (mostlyapplied in the frameworkofproduction-inventorycontrolmodels)aswellas theuse ofcontrol toolsofqualitativeperformanceanalysis, suchasattainable (reachable) sets. Limitations of control applications includeconceptual andalgorithmic restrictions suchas continuousprocess applications and specific (i.e., non-generalized) forms of constructing algorithmswith necessary requirementsconcerningoptimality, convergence,andnumerical stability. In this study,we exemplifiedanapplicationof optimal control tomanufacturing scheduling. Fundamentally, this application dynamically decomposes the assignment matrix in time using differentialequations,andthensolves (bytendency)polynomialproblemsofsmalldimensionality at eachpointof time,witha subsequent integrationof thesepartial solutionsusing themaximum principleby integratingmainandadjointequationsystems. Thesmalldimensionalityateachpointof timeresultsfromdynamicdecompositionof jobexecutiondescribedbyprecedencerelationconstraints, i.e., at eachpointof time,weconsideronlyoperations thatcanbeassignedtomachinesat thispointof time,excludingthoseoperations thatalreadyhavebeencompletedaswellas those thatcannotstart becausethepredecessorshavenotyetbeencompleted.Algorithmically,wesolvedthesedimensionally smallproblemsat subsequentpointof times, integratemainandadjoint systemsby themaximum principle,andconsideredhowaparticularassignmentdecisionchanges thescheduleperformance metric (e.g., tardiness). If an improvement isobserved, thealgorithmtakes thisassignmentandmoves further tonextpointof timeandcontinues in thismanneruntilTf. 160
zurück zum  Buch Algorithms for Scheduling Problems"
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Titel
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Autoren
Frank Werner
Larysa Burtseva
Yuri Sotskov
Herausgeber
MDPI
Ort
Basel
Datum
2018
Sprache
englisch
Lizenz
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-120-7
Abmessungen
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Seiten
212
Schlagwörter
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Kategorien
Informatik
Technik
Web-Books
Bibliothek
Datenschutz
Impressum
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems