Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Page - 160 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 160 - in Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

Image of the Page - 160 -

Image of the Page - 160 - in Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

Text of the Page - 160 -

Algorithms 2018,11, 57 Havingcalculatedoptimalsolutionsforseveralpoints, it ispossible tovalidate thedecisiontouse eitherdynamicorheuristicplanningalgorithms. InFigure4, therelativesolutionqualitygainedby theoptimalcontrolalgorithmDYNisassumedtobe100%.Therelativequality indexof theheuristic solutions is calculated as a fraction of the optimal one, i.e., it can be observed that, in the case of anumberofprocessesbetween10and12, thequalityof theheuristicandoptimalsolutionsdoesnot differ bymore than4%. In area 2, theDYNalgorithm ispreferable to theheuristics. If still using theheuristics, theFIFOalgorithmispreferable to theLast-in-first-outone. The largestbenefit from using theDYNalgorithmisachieved inarea3. In thisarea, theLIFOalgorithmispreferable to the FIFOalgorithm. Finally, theproposedmodelandalgorithmallowsfor theachievementofbetter results inmany cases in comparisonwith heuristics algorithms. However, this point is not themost important. Themost importantpoint is that thisapproachallows the interlinkingofplanningandscheduling modelswithinanadaptationframework. Therefore, thesuggestedresultsareimportant intheIndustry 4.0domain.Hence, theproposedmodelingcomplexdoesnotexistasa“thing in itself”butworks in the integrateddecision-supportsystemandguides theplanningandschedulingdecisions indynamics ontheprinciplesofoptimizationandadaptation. 6.Conclusions Optimalcontrolsas functionsof thesystemandcontrol stateallowfor thegenerationofoptimal decisions in consideration of a system’s evolution in time in thepresence of perturbationswhich result indifferent systemstates.Optimalcontrolapproaches takeanotherperspectiveasmathematical programmingmethodswhichrepresentschedulesas trajectories. Computationalalgorithmswithregardtostate, control, andconjunctivevariablespacesexist in the literature.Wehavedemonstrated that theadvantagesofoptimalcontrolmethodsareapplicable to the treatmentof largescaleproblemswithcomplexconstraints, theconsiderationofnon-stationary process executiondynamics, the representation indifferential equations of complex interrelations betweenprocessexecution,capacityevolution,andmachinesetups. Inaddition, theadvantagesof optimal control also includeaccuracyof continuous timeandaccuratepresentationof continuous flows(e.g., inprocess industryorenergysystems)with thehelpofcontinuousstatevariables. An important observation is that schedule presentation in terms of optimal controlmakes it possible to incorporate therichvarietyofcontrol theoreticaxiomswithregardto feedbackadaptive control (mostlyapplied in the frameworkofproduction-inventorycontrolmodels)aswellas theuse ofcontrol toolsofqualitativeperformanceanalysis, suchasattainable (reachable) sets. Limitations of control applications includeconceptual andalgorithmic restrictions suchas continuousprocess applications and specific (i.e., non-generalized) forms of constructing algorithmswith necessary requirementsconcerningoptimality, convergence,andnumerical stability. In this study,we exemplifiedanapplicationof optimal control tomanufacturing scheduling. Fundamentally, this application dynamically decomposes the assignment matrix in time using differentialequations,andthensolves (bytendency)polynomialproblemsofsmalldimensionality at eachpointof time,witha subsequent integrationof thesepartial solutionsusing themaximum principleby integratingmainandadjointequationsystems. Thesmalldimensionalityateachpointof timeresultsfromdynamicdecompositionof jobexecutiondescribedbyprecedencerelationconstraints, i.e., at eachpointof time,weconsideronlyoperations thatcanbeassignedtomachinesat thispointof time,excludingthoseoperations thatalreadyhavebeencompletedaswellas those thatcannotstart becausethepredecessorshavenotyetbeencompleted.Algorithmically,wesolvedthesedimensionally smallproblemsat subsequentpointof times, integratemainandadjoint systemsby themaximum principle,andconsideredhowaparticularassignmentdecisionchanges thescheduleperformance metric (e.g., tardiness). If an improvement isobserved, thealgorithmtakes thisassignmentandmoves further tonextpointof timeandcontinues in thismanneruntilTf. 160
back to the  book Algorithms for Scheduling Problems"
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Title
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Authors
Frank Werner
Larysa Burtseva
Yuri Sotskov
Editor
MDPI
Location
Basel
Date
2018
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-120-7
Size
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Pages
212
Keywords
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Categories
Informatik
Technik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems