Seite - (000337) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Bild der Seite - (000337) -
Text der Seite - (000337) -
be accepted as ameasure of success, then OH is an appropriate tool that can be
combinedwith other techniques to evaluate impact.
17.7 Conclusions
In the early-mid stages of the program’s implementation, interviewswith someof
the 80 + professionals involved in the Drought NLTA, have revealed the key
constraints and challenges to improving droughtmanagement inBrazil. The find-
ings, reported in items 5 and 6 above, show that the initiative is contributing to
address someof thereportedchallenges thatBrazilpersistently faces inproactively
managingdroughts.
The program is contributing significantly to both institutional and technical
upgrades for better droughtmanagement, and two years after the beginning of its
implementation, there is evidenceof its influence.Thisevidencehasbeenobtained
by implementing a combined PM&E approach, originally piloted by the WBI,
which was designed to capture the complexity of institutional and behavioral
changes evident in the Drought NLTA.While the methodology has some chal-
lenges and limitations, it has proven itself as an effective tool for understanding
drought and climate change resilience and adaptation.
References
Earl, S., Carden, F.,&Smutylo, T. (2001).Outcomemapping: Building learning and reflection
into development programs.Ottawa: IDRC.
Gold, J. (2013).Real-time learning inprojects:Outcomemanagement fromdesign tocompletion.
TheWorldBank Institute. Slides.
Gold, J. (2014).Guide for analyzing and learning from outcomes: Making sense of collected
outcome information to improve development results. Washington, DC: The World Bank
Institute.
Ministe´rio da Integrac¸~ao Nacional (MI) e Instituto Interamericano de Cooperac¸~ao para a
Agricultura (IICA). (2013). EstudosReferentes aoDiagno´stico da Polı´tica nacional de Secas
noBrasil:Relato´rioContendoDiagno´sticoeEmbasamentoparaaFormulac¸~aodeumaPolı´tica
Nacional deSecas noBrasil.Consultor,Otamar deCarvalho.
Otoo, S., Agapitova, N., &Behrens, J. (2009). The capacity development results framework: A
strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development. Washignton,
DC:TheWorldBank.
Wilhite, D. A. (2011, July 14–15). National drought policies: Addressing impacts and societal
vulnerability. InTowardsacompendiumonnationaldroughtpolicy:ProceedingsofanExpert
Meeting,Washington,DC.
Wilson-Grau, R., & Britt, H. (2012). Outcome harvesting. MENA Office, Ford Foundation.
Available at http://www.outcomemapping.ca/resource/outcome-harvesting
WorldBank. (2014a).Turndowntheheat:Confronting thenewclimatenormal.Washington,DC:
WorldBank.
17 Drought PreparednessPolicies andClimateChangeAdaptation andResilience. . . 325
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Titel
- Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Autoren
- Juha I. Uitto
- Jyotsna Puri
- Rob D. van den Berg
- Verlag
- Springer Open
- Datum
- 2017
- Sprache
- deutsch
- Lizenz
- CC BY-NC 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-43702-6
- Abmessungen
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Seiten
- 365
- Schlagwörter
- Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
- Kategorien
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima