Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Page - 49 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 49 - in Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

Image of the Page - 49 -

Image of the Page - 49 - in Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

Text of the Page - 49 -

Algorithms 2018,11, 80 complementaryscheduleS1 (Figure2), therearisesanewkernelwithin thesecondbin.Note that the execution intervalofkernelK1 inschedulesSandS1 isdifferent (it is [35,40) inscheduleSand [30,35) inscheduleS1). Correspondingly, thefirstbin isextendedupto timemoment35 inscheduleS, and it isextendeduptoTime30 inscheduleS1. ThenewlyarisenkernelK2=K(S1)defines twonewbins in scheduleS1;hence, that schedulecontains threebins, in total. Ingeneral, thestartingandcompletiontimesofeverybinarenotapriorifixed; theyaredefinedin accordancewith theallowableflexibility for thecorrespondingkernel intervals.Ourschemeproceeds inanumberof iterations. Toevery iteration,acompleteschedulewithaparticulardistributionof jobs into thebinscorresponds,whereas thesetof jobsscheduled ineverykernel interval remains thesame. In thisway, twoormore complete schedules for the samepartitionmightbe created (for instance, schedulesS1 and (S1)1 ofExample1; seeFigures2and3).Atan iterationh,duringtheschedulingofa bin, anewkernelmayarise,which isaddedto thecurrent setofkernelsK (kernelK2 ariseswithin thesecondbin incomplementaryscheduleS1 ofExample1): theupdatedsetcontainsall the former kernels togetherwith thenewlyarisenone (since scheduleSofFigure 1 containsonlyonekernel, K={K1}, thereareonly twobins in it; thenextgeneratedscheduleS1 ofFigure2containsalready twokernelsK1 andK2,K={K1,K2}andthreebins).Note that thepartitionof theschedulinghorizon ischangedevery timeanewkernelarises. Adjustingtimeintervalsforkernelandbinsegments: Althoughthetimeintervalwithinwhich eachkernelcanbescheduledis restricted, ithassomedegreeofflexibility,aswehave illustrated in Example1. Inparticular, theearliest scheduled jobofakernelKmightbedelayedbysomeamount withoutaffecting thecurrentmaximumjob lateness. Denote thismagnitudeby δ(K).Without loss ofgenerality, themagnitudeδ(K) cantake thevalues fromthe intervalδ(K)∈ [0,pl],where l is the delayingemerging job forkernelK in the initially constructedED-scheduleσ. Indeed, if δ(K)= 0, thekernelwillnotbedelayed,whereasδ(K)= pl corresponds to thedelayof thekernel in the initial ED-scheduleS (which is19 forkernelK1 inscheduleSofFigure1). Inparticular,welet pmaxbethe maximumjobprocessingtimeandshallassume,without lossofgenerality, thatδ(K)≤ pmax. Todefineδ(K), letusconsiderapartial scheduleconstructedbytheEDheuristics foronly jobsof kernelK∈K. Thefirst job inthatschedulestartsat time r(K) (weassumethat there isnoemerging job within that sequence,asotherwisewecontinuewithourpartitioningprocess).Note that the lateness of theoverflowjobof thatpartial schedule isa lowerboundonthemaximumjob lateness;denote this magnitudebyL∗(K). Then,L∗=maxK∈K{L∗(K)} isalsoa lowerboundonthesameobjectivevalue. Now,weletδ(K)=L∗−L∗(K), foreverykernelK∈K. The followingobservation isapparent: Observation4. For δ(K) = 0, the lateness of the latest scheduled job of kernel K is a lower bound on the optimal job lateness, and forδ(K)= pl, it is avalidupperboundonthe sameobjectivevalue. Observation5. Ina scheduleSoptminimizing themaximumjob lateness, everykernelK starts eitherno later thanat timer(K)+δ(K)or it isdelayedbysomeδ≥0,whereδ∈ [0,pmax]. Proof. First note that in any feasible schedule, everykernelK canbedelayedby theamount δ(K) without increasing themaximumjob lateness.Hence,kernelKdoesnotneedtobestartedbefore time r(K)+δ(K). Furthermore, inanycreatedED-schedule, thedelayofanykernelcannotbemore than pmax, as foranydelayingemerging job l, pl≤ pmax.Hence,δ∈ [0,pmax]. Thus for a givenpartition, the starting and completion timeof every bin in a corresponding completeschedulemayvaryaccordingtoObservation5.Ourschemeincorporatesabinarysearch procedure inwhich the trialvalues forδaredrownfrominterval [0,pmax]. Toevery iteration in the binarysearchprocedure, sometrialvalueofδ corresponds,whichdetermines themaximumallowable job lateness,aswedescribebelow. Weobserve thatnotallkernelsare tight in thesense that, foragivenkernelK∈K,δ(K)mightbe strictlygreater thanzero. ByObservation5, inanygeneratedschedulewith trialvalueδ, everykernel 49
back to the  book Algorithms for Scheduling Problems"
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Title
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems
Authors
Frank Werner
Larysa Burtseva
Yuri Sotskov
Editor
MDPI
Location
Basel
Date
2018
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-120-7
Size
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Pages
212
Keywords
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Categories
Informatik
Technik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Algorithms for Scheduling Problems