Page - 47 - in Austrian Law Journal, Volume 1/2017
Image of the Page - 47 -
Text of the Page - 47 -
ALJ 1/2017 Non-State Law in Nigeria 47
office of a President. Also abrogated is the section that made Her Majesty (the Queen of England)
in Council the final arbiter in all court cases with a value of five hundred pounds (ÂŁ 500) and
above that were initiated in Nigeria, thereby replacing it with Nigerian Supreme Court.
Conversely, Boko Haram is allegedly making its demand also on two grounds: (a) to introduce
Sharia law in the whole of Nigeria, having been dissatisfied with the justice system that is based
on common law and doctrine of equity or (b) to be allowed to secede and to form an Islamic
State under the principle of self-determination.
In essence, all peoples reserve the right to demand their right of self-determination to address a
lack of proper representation or oppression from any given government. However, there are
certain clandestine political game plots that are usually reinvigorated and brought to bear under
the guise of socio-cultural rights agitation. For example, Olayode succinctly analyses this by
reference to the disorderliness in the Nigeria polity. According to Olayode,35 there are four ethno-
regional organisations akin to MEND and Boko Haram Movements in Nigeria, albeit seemingly
milder in form, but not any less lethal in political power play. These are: Movement for the Sur-
vival of Ogoni People (MOSOP); Egbe Afenifere (Society of the lovers of good things); Ohanaeze-
Ndigbo (Igbo Citizens Assembly); and the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF). These groups can be
said to represent the “who is who” in power politics in the country and have the capacity to un-
leash political pandemonium if things are not done their own way. These groups, as Olayode
rightly observes, operate on the one hand, between the primary units of the society and the rul-
ing collective institutions, and on the other hand, they emphasise the collective identity of specific
groups, and are willing to use confrontation to achieve their objectives.36
Most arguments for the reintroduction of customary law into the Nigerian legal system cite the
principles of self-determination, freedom of religion, and cultural rights as normative references
to justify their demand. These somewhat misconceptions are usually inferred from Articles 1 and
18, and sometimes 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which
guarantee to all peoples the right of self-determination,37 as well as the right to “freedom of
thought, conscience and religion” (hereafter freedom of religion). For example, Ugochukwu rightly
observes that “the push to implement the Sharia often supported by northern intellectuals, and
coinciding with the election of a Yoruba Head of State that signalled a power shift from north to south,
[was] seen as an attempt to assert the northerners’ right to self-determination.”38 And this is what it
has turned out to be in recent times. While these rights are mostly framed as cultural, quite clearly,
none seems to ponder the parts of the international legal instrument, which provide that some of
these rights are not absolute but qualified under various paragraphs of some international legal
instruments. For example, Article 18 (3) of ICCPR emphasizes the restrictions on freedom of reli-
gion, stipulating that the manifestation of a religion must take into consideration those limita-
35 Kehinde Olayode, Self-Determination, Ethno-Nationalism and Conflicts in Nigeria, https://www.researchgate.net/
profile/Muhammad_Kamaldeen_IMAM-TAMIM/publication/235892780_Kehinde_OLAYODE_-_Self-Determination_
Ethno-Nationalism_and_Conflicts_in_Nigeria/links/ 09e41513ea7187fc81000000.pdf (last visited Mar. 27, 2017).
36 Infra note 39.
37 Self-determination principles are particularly highlighted in Articles 1(2) of U.N. Charter; 1(1) of ICCPR; and 1(1)
ICESCR.
38 Françoise Parent-Ugochukwu, Book Review of Democratization and Islamic Law: The Sharia Conflict in Nigeria, (Dec. 1,
2009), http://www.accord.org.za/ajcr-issues/democratization-and-islamic-law-the-sharia-conflict-in-nigeria/ (last
visited Mar. 27, 2017).
back to the
book Austrian Law Journal, Volume 1/2017"
Austrian Law Journal
Volume 1/2017
- Title
- Austrian Law Journal
- Volume
- 1/2017
- Author
- Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
- Editor
- Brigitta Lurger
- Elisabeth Staudegger
- Stefan Storr
- Location
- Graz
- Date
- 2017
- Language
- German
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Size
- 19.1 x 27.5 cm
- Pages
- 56
- Keywords
- Recht, Gesetz, Rechtswissenschaft, Jurisprudenz
- Categories
- Zeitschriften Austrian Law Journal