Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
International
Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering
Page - 286 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 286 - in Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering

Image of the Page - 286 -

Image of the Page - 286 - in Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering

Text of the Page - 286 -

5.2 FLUSHING AND DREDGING BALANCE AGAINST RIVER BED DEGRADATION As described above that in sedimentation upper reach and degradation of river bed are also problem in water resources management. The degradation of river bed along Brantas River is between 2 s / d 8 m. To reduce of river bed degradation some efforts that have been done are: ï‚· Controlling illegal sand mining ï‚· Conducting public awareness on the impact of illegal sand mining ï‚· Implementation of flushing or dredging with riverine disposal to channel below. Over the past five years, the average sediment that flows to downstream is 350,865 m3/year. While the amount of sediment that can be supply form dredging with riverine disposal to channel below is 250,475 m3/year. If the amount of illegal sand mining along the Brantas River in lower reach of Wlingi dam is 2,470,600 m3/year, and there is no dredging with riverine disposal to channel below, flushing should be done 7 times a year. This is very difficult because the implementation of flushing is depend on the available inflow. Implementation of dredging 2 million m3/year with riverine disposal to channel below in Wlingi Reservoir requires a huge cost. The possible efforts have be done through sustainable public persuasive and constructive actions through controlling the illegal sand mining. 5. CONCLUSION 1. Implementation of flushing is very effective to reduce sediment in the reservoir which has river bed degradation in lower reach. Financially sedimentation flushing can save the cost of Rp. 35.85 billion compared to dredging with spoil bank disposal, while dredging with riverine disposal to channel below can save about Rp. 14.96 billion compared to the dredging with spoil bank disposal. However flushing implementation can not be implemented every year because it must consider the reservoir inflow. 2. If the inflow is not possible to carry out flushing, dredging with riverine disposal to channel below can be done. 3. Although not significant, the implementation of flushing and dredging with riverine disposal to channel below can reduce the river bed degradation occurring in lower reach. To balance the illegal sand mining in downstream it is necessary to flush 7 times a year and it is difficult to achieve. Other efforts to maintain the river bed are the control of illegal sand mining, and public campaign. 286
back to the  book Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering"
Book of Full Papers Symposium Hydro Engineering
Title
Book of Full Papers
Subtitle
Symposium Hydro Engineering
Author
Gerald Zenz
Publisher
Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz
Location
Graz
Date
2018
Language
English
License
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ISBN
978-3-85125-620-8
Size
20.9 x 29.6 cm
Pages
2724
Keywords
Hydro, Engineering, Climate Changes
Categories
International
Naturwissenschaften Physik
Technik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Book of Full Papers