Page - 354 - in Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering
Image of the Page - 354 -
Text of the Page - 354 -
Given from fig 2 and fig3, the regressive results agree well with the observed data.
The effects of the formula can be accepted. Furthermore, a detailed analysis based
on physical meanings should be done:
(1) The full regression model and selecting regression model of Y1: the main
influencing factors on Y1 are outflow discharge (the exponent number is 0.417),
sediment concentration flowing into the reservoir (the exponent number is
0.415), sediment concentration flowing out of the reservoir (the exponent
number is -0.070), local terrain factor in the tributaries (the exponent number
is -0.031), local terrain factor in the main channel (the exponent number is
0.030) and the location of the front of the delta (the exponent number is 0.951).
Considering the importance of those factors, the location of the front of the
delta, outflow discharge and sediment concentration flowing into the reservoir
take the first three places and agree well with the physical meanings.
Additionally, although the exponent number of the local terrain factor in the
tributaries is small enough, the correlation coefficient of that is significant. So
the local terrain factor should also be chosen. Then the final form of the
regressive model for Y1 is shown as follows:
?Ì‚?
1 = 0.534?Ì‚?
2
∗0.4?̂?
3
0.4?Ì‚?
4
−0.1X̂6 (R
2=0.638) [8]
The exponent number and independent variables are all simplified and the results
are shown in fig 4.
(2) The full regression model and selecting regression model of Y2: the main
influencing factors on Y2 are outflow discharge (the exponent number is 1.373),
sediment concentration flowing into the reservoir (the exponent number is -
0.430), sediment concentration flowing out of the reservoir (the exponent
number is 0.248), local terrain factor in the tributaries (the exponent number is
0.317), local terrain factor in the main channel (the exponent number is 0.320)
and the location of the front of the delta (the exponent number is 0.719).
Considering the importance of those factors, outflow discharge, the location of
the front of the delta, and sediment concentration flowing into the reservoir take
the first three places. Based on the physical meanings, these three factors
should all have positive correlations with the depositing volume in the
tributaries, while the sediment concentration flowing into the reservoir showed
an opposite relation in this model. The physical interpretation is: the sediment
flowing into the reservoir area is not equal or positive related to the depositing
volume in the reservoir area, because there is a drastic process of the sediment
exchange between the channel bed and water flow. Even though clear water
flows into the reservoir area, it also may cause a sediment transporting process
and a deposition in the river mouth of the tributaries. As a result, the sediment
concentration flowing into the reservoir is deleted from the model. Similarly, we
can get the final form of the regressive model for Y2 :
?Ì‚?
2 = 85.57?Ì‚?
2
∗1.4?̂?
4
0.3?Ì‚?
5
0.3?Ì‚?
6
0.7 (R2=0.820) [9]
354
Book of Full Papers
Symposium Hydro Engineering
- Title
- Book of Full Papers
- Subtitle
- Symposium Hydro Engineering
- Author
- Gerald Zenz
- Publisher
- Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz
- Location
- Graz
- Date
- 2018
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-85125-620-8
- Size
- 20.9 x 29.6 cm
- Pages
- 2724
- Keywords
- Hydro, Engineering, Climate Changes
- Categories
- International
- Naturwissenschaften Physik
- Technik