Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
International
Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering
Page - 576 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 576 - in Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering

Image of the Page - 576 -

Image of the Page - 576 - in Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering

Text of the Page - 576 -

3.2. COMPARISON WITH TYPICAL DROUGHT INDICES This chapter compared DIDI with typical drought indices such as SWSI and SPI. SWSI and SPI are widely used as drought indices. SWSI is calculated by monthly precipitation, snowpack, streamflow, and reservoir storage. Fig. 8 shows DIDI compared with SWSI. SWSI defines -1 or less as drought. The SWSI indicates drought at the time of reduction in water supply adequately, but it can be seen that the drought by SWSI is very common even in the normal water supply condition. SPI most widely used drought index and it was agreed that using SPI as universal drought index to cope with climate risks at ‘The Inter-Regional Workshop on Indices and Early Warning Systems for Drought’ held at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. SPI can calculate simply and easily collect data due to using rainfall only. SPI is calculated by standardizing value of cumulative distribution function (CDF) of Gamma distribution that is estimated using sums of rainfall for a preset period (3 months, 6 months, 12 months, etc.). “Fig. 9” shows DIDI and SPI of 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. When visually confirmed, DIDI seems to reflect the point of the water supply reductions better. As shown in “Fig. 9,” one can see that 6-months and 12-months SPIs that indicate long-term drought are better able to monitor drought than 3-month and 6-month SPIs that show short- and mid-term. In order to evaluate the drought monitoring ability of SWSI and SPI, ROC analysis was also conducted for these. “Table 2” indicates ROC scores of DIDI, SWSI, SPI(3), SPI(6), SPI(9), and SPI(12). ROC score of DIDI was 0.93 which was 0.22 greater than it of SWSI and 0.33, 0.22, 0.16, and 0.17 greater than it of SPI(3), SPI(6), SPI(9), and SPI(12), respectively. By applying the dam operation and threshold, DIDI was able to express the drought of dam inflow adequately, which indicates that the DIDI is useful for monitoring and responding the drought, and its application would help to mitigate drought damages. Fig. 8 Comparison with DIDI and SWSI 576
back to the  book Book of Full Papers - Symposium Hydro Engineering"
Book of Full Papers Symposium Hydro Engineering
Title
Book of Full Papers
Subtitle
Symposium Hydro Engineering
Author
Gerald Zenz
Publisher
Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz
Location
Graz
Date
2018
Language
English
License
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ISBN
978-3-85125-620-8
Size
20.9 x 29.6 cm
Pages
2724
Keywords
Hydro, Engineering, Climate Changes
Categories
International
Naturwissenschaften Physik
Technik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Book of Full Papers