Page - (000138) - in Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
Image of the Page - (000138) -
Text of the Page - (000138) -
Listofmonitoringparameters is theshortlistofdata formonitoringemissions to
be collectedbyproject participants, the approved sources, anddefault values from
IPCCorotherapprovedstandards thatare ready touse.Thesedefaultvaluescanbe
applied in the standardized Microsoft Excel-based monitoring and calculation
spreadsheets in eachmethodology. The set of spreadsheets is arguably themost
valuable aspect of the JCMMRV for the project participants, as they clearly
indicate the options of data collection method, default values, and formulas to
calculate referenceemission, project emission, andemission reduction. Inaddition
tothat,projectmonitoringteamisalsodescribedinthesamespreadsheet.Thebasic
requirements such as continuity of operation, production year, and availability of
data are assumedasgiven, resulting inbrief andeasy-to-readdocuments.Byusing
these sheets, project participants do not need to spend much time to justify the
calculation formula andways to acquire requireddata.
In the long run, quality ofmethodologyand its developmentprocess need tobe
consistentbetweencountriesand improve inclusionof localprogramsorstandards.
It is also important to designmore generalmethodologies to increase their appli-
cability tosimilarprojects.Forexample,asopposedtodevelopingmethodologyfor
a specific ‘air conditionerswith inverters to public sector building’ (VN_AM002),
themethodologycouldbedeveloped forair conditionerswith inverters toanykind
of building.
7.4.3 ProcessingTime
Strengthenedmethodand time-efficient approvalprocesswill improve theefficacy
of JCMMRV. So far approval process are being implemented in an efficient
manner. Approving proposed methodologies take from 18 to 384 days with an
averageofonly107days from the timeofmethodologyproposed.Similar trend is
observed in project registration process, which generally takes less than amonth
with anaverageof10days.15These effectiveprocessesbenefit fromclose cooper-
ation between Japanese and partner countries government, supporting agencies,
projectparticipants,andtheJCMbudgetallocatedfor implementationsupport.This
could be expected to continue in the long run, as long as institutional support and
commitment from the involved countries at least remain.
As the number of JCMprojects continue to increase, however, itmay become
more challenging to maintain such speed. Thus methodology reviewers such as
JCM secretariat and the general public need to ensure time efficiency does not
overrule quality.Capacity building, technical assistance, and resources are impor-
tant factors in this aspect.
15Ibid.
120 A.Amellina
Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Title
- Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development
- Authors
- Juha I. Uitto
- Jyotsna Puri
- Rob D. van den Berg
- Publisher
- Springer Open
- Date
- 2017
- Language
- German
- License
- CC BY-NC 3.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-43702-6
- Size
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 365
- Keywords
- Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Climate Change/ Climate Change Impacts, Environmental Management
- Categories
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima