Page - 126 - in Critical Issues in Science, Technology and Society Studies - Conference Proceedings of the 17th STS Conference Graz 2018

%73 biophilic, positive response to prefer to use, biophilic according to the judges This is an example which shows consistency between the evaluation tools. *The possible reasons were: natural material, clarity, strength, simplicity, directness. %62 biophobic/non-biophilic, negative response to prefer to use, biophobic/non-biophilic according to the judges This is an example which shows consistency between the evaluation tools. *The possible reasons were: reminds scary living beings, texture, plastic as the material. %64 biophobic/non-biophilic, negative response to prefer to use, biophilic according to the judges This is an example which shows inconsistency between the evaluation tools. Judges found it biophilic because of the biomimic features but it reminded scary living beings to the users and also it felt fake to them. 126