Page - 159 - in Critical Issues in Science, Technology and Society Studies - Conference Proceedings of the 17th STS Conference Graz 2018
Image of the Page - 159 -
Text of the Page - 159 -
5) environmental attitude and attitude towards plastic fruit packaging, as well as,
6) sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. age, sex).
Sections 2 and 5 are necessary to answer the research questions, whereby sections 1 and 6 are
used to describe the results in more detail. The final version of the questionnaire was tested in a
pre-test and consisted of 43 questions. The sample size of the online survey contains 999
respondents, who study at a Bavarian university and are 18 years or older. Furthermore, only
attendees who answered the whole questionnaire were taken into account.
One main part of the study is to better understand the knowledge regarding plastic fruit
packaging. Therefore, the respondents were asked to estimate the functions of plastic fruit
packaging, such as protection, transportability and hygiene (JĂĽnemann & Schmidt 2000; Pfohl
2004). A five-point Likert-scale was used to assess the students’ estimations. The other main
part of the study is to analyse the students’ environmental attitudes and attitudes towards plastic
fruit packaging. The environmental attitude was recorded using the revised New Ecological
Paradigm (NEP) Scale by Dunlap et al. (2000) in the German language. The revised NEP-Scale
is a multiple-item scale which is commonly used as a method to assess environmental attitude
and has already been applied to several studies (Atav et al. 2015; Sudbury-Riley et al. 2014; Xue
et al. 2016). Further, the attitude towards plastic fruit packaging was measured using a self-
developed multiple-item scale. For the development process of this scale, relevant literature was
consulted (Bovensiepen et al. 2015, 2018; JeĹĽewska-Zychowicz & Jeznach 2015;
Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V. 2015). The statements used were verified by experts (local
grocery shop owners and food retailers), were tested with 24 respondents in a pre-test and were
used to generate a multiple-item scale consisting of 10 items. A five-point Likert-scale was used
to measure both, the NEP-Scale and the attitude towards plastic fruit packaging scale.
Furthermore, a semantic differential was applied to measure the connotative meaning of plastics
and bioplastics for fruit packaging. The connotations measured with a seven-level-rating scale
were used to derive the attitude towards plastic fruit packaging. The polar adjectives were
based on relevant literature (Foscht & Swoboda 2011; Plumb et al. 2013). Thus, the results of the
self-developed multiple-item scale could be described in more detail using the semantic
differential. Within this study, bioplastics have been defined as plastics made from renewable
resources (Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. 2016).
4. Results
The socio-demographic sample characteristics as well as the main grocery store for buying fruit
of the respondents is shown in Table 1. The distribution of age resembles the structure of
German students (Middendorff et al. 2017), while females are over-represented in the survey
with 62,2 % because in Germany 48.2 % of students are female. (Statistisches Bundesamt
2016). Furthermore, the average age of the respondents (23.15 years) nearly equals the average
age of German students which is 23.5 years (Statistisches Bundesamt 2017). Additionally,
almost all respondents (80 %) purchase their fruit mainly in discounters and supermarkets. Only
6.3 % of the participants are not responsible for grocery shopping.
159
Critical Issues in Science, Technology and Society Studies
Conference Proceedings of the 17th STS Conference Graz 2018
- Title
- Critical Issues in Science, Technology and Society Studies
- Subtitle
- Conference Proceedings of the 17th STS Conference Graz 2018
- Editor
- Technische Universität Graz
- Publisher
- Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz
- Location
- Graz
- Date
- 2018
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-85125-625-3
- Size
- 21.6 x 27.9 cm
- Pages
- 214
- Keywords
- Kritik, TU, Graz, TU Graz, Technologie, Wissenschaft
- Categories
- International
- Tagungsbände
- Technik