Page - 213 - in Digital Entrepreneurship - Impact on Business and Society
Image of the Page - 213 -
Text of the Page - 213 -
opportunities for entrepreneurs.However, cross-border opportunities havenot been
fully exploited by investors yet (Wardrop et al. 2015), and therefore, entrepreneurs
should still focus on developing and leveraging their own local personal network.
Critically, local investors tend to invest early, and thismay represent an important
signal to the other funders in the initial phase of campaign (Agrawal et al. 2011).
3.1.2 Peer-to-Peer Lending
Lending-based crowdfunding, typically referred to as peer-to-peer (P2P) lending,
hasattractedmostof thecrowdfunding investment so far.P2P lendingplatformsare
typically quite targeted as theymostly focus on either personal or business lending
withvery fewexceptions (e.g.LendingClub1).Table 4provides anoverviewof the
funding provided through P2P lending platforms by region and segment.
Zopawas thefirst P2P lendingplatform tobe launchedback in 2005 (Cummins
et al. 2019). Two other largeUS-based platforms, Prosper.com and LendingClub,
followed in 2006 and 2007, respectively (Greiner andWang 2009). However, the
amount of capital channelled through P2P lending started growing significantly
only post-2009, in the aftermath of thefinancial crisis. In fact, the combined effect
of the crisis and the introductionof stricter banking regulations (e.g.Basel II)made
access to capital extremely difficult for small enterprises and entrepreneurs.On the
otherhand, lowinterest ratesmadebondsandother traditionalfinancial instruments
unattractive for investors. In this context, P2P lending platforms started to prosper
as they represented suitable alternatives to traditional channels for both businesses
and investors.
P2P lending is anything but new. Entrepreneurs have traditionally leveraged
their personal network to raise capital (Berger andUdell 1998;Kotha andGeorge
2012; Robb and Robinson 2014; Cummins et al. 2019). Small loans are often
providedby familymembers or friendson thebasis of personal relationships rather
than formal due diligence. These informal transactions carry undeniable risks for
both borrowers and lenders. Online P2P lending platforms have improved this
process by providing online marketplaces that enable borrowers and lenders to
transact directlywith defined rules of engagement and by providing due diligence
services that reduces the riskofdefault (Cumminset al. 2019). Inexchange for this,
platforms charge a fee, typically a small percentage of the funded amount, paid by
borrowers.
A brief outline of the funding process for business loans on LendingClub is as
follows.2Apotential borrower registers to the platform, provides verifiable contact
and bank details together with the desired loan amount and duration. Then, the
borrower provides additional background information about the business and its
currentfinancial status (e.g. last year’s revenues and profits, ownership, and other
existingfinancial commitments suchas loansor leases).Theapproval process takes
on average seven days, and the platform sets the interest rate based on its own risk
1https://www.lendingclub.com/.
2https://help.lendingclub.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001352047-Business-loan-application-walk
through.
NewSources of Entrepreneurial Finance 219
Digital Entrepreneurship
Impact on Business and Society
- Title
- Digital Entrepreneurship
- Subtitle
- Impact on Business and Society
- Authors
- Mariusz Soltanifar
- Mathew Hughes
- Lutz Göcke
- Publisher
- Springer Verlag
- Location
- Cham
- Date
- 2021
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-030-53914-6
- Size
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Pages
- 340
- Keywords
- Entrepreneurship, IT in Business, Innovation/Technology Management, Business and Management, Open Access, Digital transformation and entrepreneurship, ICT based business models
- Category
- International