Page - ix - in Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners
Image of the Page - ix -
Text of the Page - ix -
3. Definitions of Health Informatics
There is still no single universally agreed definition of health informatics, but we now
seem to have a converging set of ideas. Although the principal professional societies still
use the older and narrower term “medical informatics” in their organizational names (e.g.
EFMI, IMIA and the American Medical Informatics Association, AMIA), they each pro-
mote more inclusive wording in their official publications. Early definitions of medical
informatics were:
• “the field that concerns itself with the cognitive, information processing, and
communication tasks of medical practice, education, and research, including the
information science and the technology to support these tasks” [9]
• “the scientific discipline concerned with the systematic processing of data, in-
formation and knowledge in medicine and health care” [10]
Whereas IMIA prefers the phrase “biomedical and health informatics” (BMHI) [11],
AMIA favours the term “biomedical informatics” (BMI), which it defines [12] as:
• “the interdisciplinary field that studies and pursues the effective uses of bio-
medical data, information, and knowledge for scientific inquiry, problem solv-
ing and decision making, motivated by efforts to improve human health”.
In this definition, BMI is the “scientific core” that is applied in the domains of bio-
informatics and imaging informatics, health informatics (comprising clinical and public
health informatics) and translational informatics. It has been argued that the more holis-
tic term “biopsychosocial” would be a better adjective than “biomedical” [13], but in its
World Health Organization definition the global term “health” subsumes all aspects of
physical, mental and social well-being [14]. Therefore, we use the term “health infor-
matics” as a simple and inclusive descriptor to cover both BMHI and BMI.
We find the AMIA definition particularly helpful in its articulation of the three
“foundational domains” of health informatics: health science, information science, and
social science and their various overlaps (see Figure 1, from [15]). We have used this
model to structure the content of this textbook around the major subject areas.
4. Meaning and Importance of Interdisciplinarity in Health Informatics
Whatever label we choose to adopt for our field, it is unquestionably “interdisciplinary”
as noted in the AMIA definition. Reflecting the three foundational domains, it is always
the case that health informatics needs both healthcare and information science
knowledge and skills. Increasingly often, the importance of the social sciences is also
recognized. Interdisciplinary is defined as “contributing to or benefiting from two or
more disciplines” [16] and is helpfully distinguished from “multidisciplinary” and
“transdisciplinary” in the following summary [17]:
• Multidisciplinarity draws on knowledge from different disciplines but stays
within their boundaries. Interdisciplinarity analyzes, synthesizes and harmo-
nizes links between disciplines into a coordinated and coherent whole. Trans-
disciplinarity integrates the natural, social and health sciences in a humanities
context, and transcends their traditional boundaries. ix
back to the
book Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners"
Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
Knowledge Base for Practitioners
- Title
- Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
- Subtitle
- Knowledge Base for Practitioners
- Authors
- Philip Scott
- Nicolette de Keizer
- Andrew Georgiou
- Publisher
- IOS Press BV
- Location
- Amsterdam
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-1-61499-991-1
- Size
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Pages
- 242
- Category
- Informatik