Page - 48 - in Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners

References 1. E. Coiera. Guide to Health Informatics (3rd Edition). 3rd ed. London: CRC Press, 2015. 2. E. Coiera. A New Informatics Geography. IMIA Yearbook 2016:251-55 3. C.E. Shannon, W. Weaver. A mathematical theory of communication: American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 1948. 4. B Toth, J Gray, A Brice. The number needed to read—a new measure of journal value. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2005;22(2):81-82 5. P Pluye, R.M. Grad, J. Johnson-Lafleur, et al. Number Needed to Benefit From Information (NNBI): Proposal From a Mixed Methods Research Study With Practicing Family Physicians. The Annals of Family Medicine 11(6) (2013), 559-67. 6. R.A. Howard. Information value theory. Systems Science and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions 2(1) (1966), 22-26. 7. M.G.M. Hunink, P.P. Glasziou, J.E. Siegel, et al. Decision making in health and medicine - integrating evidence and values. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 8. H. Sox, M. Blatt, M. Higgins, et al. Medical Decision Making. Stoneham, MA, USA: Butterworths- Heineman, 1988. 9. A decision analytic method for scoring performance on computer-based patient simulations. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium; 1997. American Medical Informatics Association. 10. E. Fenwick, K. Claxton, M. Sculpher. The value of implementation and the value of information: combined and uneven development. Medical Decision Making 28(1) (2008), 21-32. 11. R.S. Braithwaite, M. Scotch. Using value of information to guide evaluation of decision supports for differential diagnosis: is it time for a new look? BMC medical informatics and decision making 13(1) (2013), 105. 12. T. Bowden, E. Coiera. The role and benefits of accessing primary care patient records during unscheduled care: a systematic review. BMC medical informatics and decision making 17(1) (2017), 138. 13. N. Ivers, G. Jamtvedt, S. Flottorp, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2012;6(6) 14. P.S. Roshanov, S. Misra, H.C. Gerstein, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implementation Science 6(1); (2011), 92. 15. N.M. Ivers, A. Sales, H. Colquhoun, et al. No more ‘business as usual’with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implementation Science 9 (2014), 14 16. W.T. Gude, E. Coiera, N. Peek. Optimizing Digital Health Informatics Interventions Through Unobtrusive Quantitative Process Evaluations. Studies in health technology and informatics 228 (2016), 594-98. 17. M.O. Kim, E. Coiera, F. Magrabi. Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 24(2) (2017), 246-50. 18. A.Y.S. Lau, J. Proudfoot, A. Andrews, et al. Which bundles of features in a web-based personally controlled health management are associated with consumer help-seeking behaviors for physical and emotional wellbeing? Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(5) (2013), e79. 19. V. Sintchenko, E.W. Coiera. Which clinical decisions benefit from automation? A task complexity approach. International journal of medical informatics 70(2) 2003, 309-316. 20. R. Parasuraman, T.B. Sheridan, C.D. Wickens. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 30(3) (2000), 286-97|. E.Coiera /AssessingTechnologySuccessandFailureUsing InformationValueChainTheory48