Page - 182 - in Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners
Image of the Page - 182 -
Text of the Page - 182 -
2.2. Evaluating implementationof anew electronic preoperative information system
within a surgical pre-assessment clinic.
Surgical pre-assessment clinics (PACs) evaluate whether patients may be suitable
for day case surgeryor 23-hour care,or may require a longer in-patient stay. These have
been introduced in Scotland as a result of policy recommendations intended to reduce
unnecessary burden on services, and reduce surgical mortality rates [12]. PACs act as a
gateway to surgical services from a wide range of referral pathways, involving multiple
information flows. The PAC design evaluated by Bouamrane and Mair (2014)
incorporated development and implementation of an electronic pre-operative
information management system, to facilitate information sharing among members of
the multidisciplinary PAC team. Development occurred iteratively by PAC staff in
collaboration with the local NHS Health Board Information Technology team. In this
article, the authors focus on one site (Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary - DGRI)
from a national study in Scotland.The authors modelled clinical processes using process-
mapping techniques, and conducted 10 semi-structured interviews with five participants
across four visits to the clinic site [12]. NPT was used in analysis of results from both
process mapping and qualitative interview data.
The rationale for the clinic was found to be well established at DGRI, supported by
previous institutional experience of problems with traditional in-patient routes lacking
pre-assessment. In addition, the importance and relevance of the service was reinforced
by national policy initiatives that incorporated performance targets. Coherence of the
PAC in terms of overall relevance to strategic objectives of the institution was therefore
well established. Coherence wasalso found to be high within the pre-assessment clinic,
but less so at points of contact with other services. This was attributed in part to the
number of different possible pathways to the PAC which were observed to be confusing
to staff within the clinic, in addition to the fact that junior doctors involved in various
routes to the PAC were not routinely involved in the clinic’s assessment processes.
The collaborative design of PAC implementation and development, particularly
with respect to the pre-operative information management system, was reported as a
strength of the project. The authors report a ‘teething period’ of 12 months, after which
specialist nurses leading PAC development were ‘entirely satisfied’ with information
management practices. The combination of leadership from experienced pre-surgical
nurses, and collaborative ongoing development with local NHS IT services ensured that
key people relating to both clinical and health informatics aspects of the project were
working together to drive forward development (an aspect of Cognitive participation).
Staff within the multi-disciplinary team (MDT)were found to behighly experienced
in care and management of day-case patients. This foundation allowed PAC staff to
effectively define their roles in relation to the new clinic, and build both individual and
collective understandings of accountability (collective action). At the level of the wider
institution however, participants expressed concerns with respect to replication by the
PAC of information available through other sources (i.e. primary care). Here, the authors
note that such concerns may in principle be addressed through improvements to
integration of existing information systems. In the context of Collective action, such a
development would require extending professional relationships through which roles are
defined to encompass inter-departmental working (i.e. who is responsible for which tasks
within an overall care pathway). Finally, although the prior experience of PAC staff was
important in the success of the nurse-led clinic design process, there were no formal
processes for continuing professional development or training at the PAC (reflexive
M.BracherandC.R.May / ImplementingandEmbeddingHealth
InformaticsSystems182
back to the
book Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners"
Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
Knowledge Base for Practitioners
- Title
- Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
- Subtitle
- Knowledge Base for Practitioners
- Authors
- Philip Scott
- Nicolette de Keizer
- Andrew Georgiou
- Publisher
- IOS Press BV
- Location
- Amsterdam
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-1-61499-991-1
- Size
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Pages
- 242
- Category
- Informatik