Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners
Page - 186 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 186 - in Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners

Image of the Page - 186 -

Image of the Page - 186 - in Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners

Text of the Page - 186 -

3.2. Generating research questions using NPT. Figure 3.Worked example use of NPT in nutrition screening and care planning scenario. In Figure 3, we can see how a table might be used to identify questions relevant to the Coherence domain of NPT (see also Appendix). Note that wording of questions preserves the emphasis on action; for example, the planning question linked to the Differentiationcomponent reads: ‘Howwill information provided by the implementation team help HCPs distinguish the new procedure from current working practices?’. The ‘how’ is important here because while procedural differences between the two may seem obvious, it is possible that participants may interpret this process as a different way of doing the same thing (that is, they may not immediately see the benefits that those developing the intervention have in mind). Accounting for how these differences are made visible thus relates to an important part of the work necessary for successful implementation. For example, Ross et al’s experience of implementing the HeLP- Diabetes intervention (discussed in section 2.1) indicates that discussions with HCPs, in addition to written information sources, were important in identifying and addressing questions about how the new procedure differed from existing practice [11]. Focus on action is also preserved in the example evaluation question (also linked to Differentiation): ‘Do community HCPs see the new procedure as different from existing ways of working, and if so how?’ (see Figure 3). In both planning and evaluation, framing of the question will also affect further discussions about methods (i.e. a focus purely on belief or sentiment may suggest methods, such as attitudinal surveys using scale measures, that fail to capture processes relevant to understanding implementation which may better be investigated by, for example, interviews or in-person observations). M.BracherandC.R.May / ImplementingandEmbeddingHealth InformaticsSystems186
back to the  book Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics - Knowledge Base for Practitioners"
Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics Knowledge Base for Practitioners
Title
Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics
Subtitle
Knowledge Base for Practitioners
Authors
Philip Scott
Nicolette de Keizer
Andrew Georgiou
Publisher
IOS Press BV
Location
Amsterdam
Date
2019
Language
English
License
CC BY-NC 4.0
ISBN
978-1-61499-991-1
Size
16.0 x 24.0 cm
Pages
242
Category
Informatik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics