Page - xx - in Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options

Table 14.4 Adaptation and residual costs for selected regions (low damages-high discount rate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 Table 15.1 Loss&Damage concepts applied to the SWPacific. . . . . . . . 369 Table 17.1 Characteristics andapplicability of different decision-support tools for ex-ante and ex-post disaster riskmanagement. . . . . . 413 Table 18.1 Categories of Arctic studies focusing on risks and impacts of climate change (N=164) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430 Table 18.2 Examples limitingArctic communities to adapt to climate change. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438 Table 19.1 Annual allocations to the trust fund are as follows (BCCT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464 Table 21.1 Examples of risk financing arrangements at micro, intermediary andmacro scales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488 Table 21.2 Financing instruments for protecting government budgets. . . . 489 Table 21.3 An overview of preventative and curative functions of climate risk insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505 Table 22.1 Practical Action’s framework for technology justice with five components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518 Table 22.2 Overview of public and private flood risk actions and their intended effect on losses and damages . . . . . . . . . . . 524 Table 22.3 Transparency in the three key global agreements: reportingmechanisms, indicators related to impacts and risks, andmeans of implementation for technology, with some detail on Bangladesh, India andNepal. . . . . . . . . . 531 Table 22.4 Injustices identified in current flood earlywarning systems in SouthAsia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536 xxii List of Tables