Page - 130 - in Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
Image of the Page - 130 -
Text of the Page - 130 -
130 R.A. Jameset al.
Fig.5.4 Aschematic illustrationof theprobabilitydistributionofaclimatevariable (suchas tem-
peratureorprecipitation)with(solidredline)andwithout (greenline)humaninfluenceonclimate.
Extremeeventattributionstudiesusestatisticsorclimatemodels toestimatethesedistributionsand
then calculate the change inprobability associatedwith anthropogenic forcing (i.e. the difference
betweenthegreenhatchedarea—P0—andtheredhatchedarea—P1).Thereddashedlineillustrates
howtheprobabilitydistributionof thevariablemight change in future. SourceStott et al. (2016)
(see www.climatecentral.org). For example, the flooding in Louisiana in August
2016was attributed to have beenmade twice as likely due to anthropogenic cli-
mate change, two weeks after the event occurred (van der Wiel et al. 2017).
A large signal from anthropogenic climate change on the early 2017 drought
in Kenya could be excluded while the event was still unfolding (Uhe et al.
2017).
It is currently not possible to conduct scientifically viable attribution studies for
all typesofextremeweatherevents leadingtolossesanddamages(seeFig.5.5),and
some specific cases can be particularly difficult tomodel due to rare and complex
weatherpatterns,aswasfoundforflooding inPakistan in2010(e.g.Christidisetal.
2013).There are also important variations in the availability andquality of attribu-
tion evidencebetween regions.Currently,manymore studies havebeen conducted
for developed than developing countries (Otto et al. 2015a). There are efforts to
change this (e.g.wwa.climatecentral.org), but limited availability of data in devel-
oping countries is a barrier (Huggel et al. 2015a).This is highly relevant forL&D,
because itmeans it is challenging tomake attribution statements about losses and
damages from some disasters. It is also important to highlight that in some cases
anthropogenicclimatechangeisfoundtodecreasetheprobabilityofextremeevents,
suchasspringfloodingfromsnowmelt in theUK(Kayetal.2011)ornot toalter the
likelihoodof theeventoccurring, as for the2014–15droughts in theSaoPaoloarea
(Ottoet al. 2015b).
Uncertaintiesassociatedwithevent attributionstudiescanmake the results chal-
lengingtocommunicateandapplyinpolicy(Ottoetal.2015a),aswithprojectionsof
climatechange(Weaveretal.2013).Theresultsofattributionstudiesalsodependon
Loss and Damage from Climate Change
Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
- Title
- Loss and Damage from Climate Change
- Subtitle
- Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
- Authors
- Reinhard Mechler
- Laurens M. Bouwer
- Thomas Schinko
- Swenja Surminski
- JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer
- Publisher
- Springer Open
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-72026-5
- Size
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Pages
- 580
- Keywords
- Environment, Climate change, Environmental law, Environmental policy, Risk management
- Categories
- International
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima