Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
International
Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
Page - 155 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 155 - in Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options

Image of the Page - 155 -

Image of the Page - 155 - in Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options

Text of the Page - 155 -

Chapter6 ThePoliticsof (andBehind) theUNFCCC’sLossandDamage Mechanism ElisaCalliari,SwenjaSurminskiandJaroslavMysiak Abstract Despite beingoneof themost controversial issues tobe recently treated within climate negotiations, Loss andDamage (L&D) has attracted little attention amongscholarsofInternationalRelations(IR).Inthischapterwetakethe“structural- istparadox” inL&Dnegotiationsasour startingpoint, consideringhowIRtheories can help to explain the somewhat surprising capacity of weak parties to achieve resultswhile negotiatingwith stronger parties.We adopt amulti-faceted notion of power, drawing fromtheneorealist, liberal andconstructivist schoolsof thought, in order toexplainhowL&Dmilestoneswere reached.Ouranalysis shows that the IR disciplinecangreatlycontribute to thedebate,notonlybyenhancingunderstanding of thenegotiationprocessandrelatedoutcomesbutalsobyoffering insightsonhow theissuecouldbefruitfullymovedforward.Inparticular,wenotethekeyimportance that discursive power had in the attainment of L&Dmilestones: FramingL&D in ethicalandlegal termsappealed tostandardsrelevantbeyondtheUNFCCCcontext, including basicmoral norms linked to island states’ narratives of survival and the reference to international customary law. These broader standards are in principle recognisedbybothcontendingparties and thisbroader framingofL&Dhashelped to prove the need for action onL&D.However,wefind that a change of narrative maybeneeded toavoid turning the issue intoawin-losenegotiationgame. Instead, astrongeremphasisonmutualgains throughadaptationandactiononL&Dforboth developedanddevelopingcountries isneededaswellasclarityonthelimitsof these strategies. Examples of suchmutual gains aremore resilient global supply chains, reductionofclimate-inducedmigrationandenhancedsecurity.Asaresult,actingon E.Calliari (B) · J.Mysiak Euro-MediterraneanCenteronClimateChange (CMCC)andCa’Foscari, UniversityofVenice,Venice, Italy e-mail: elisa.calliari@cmcc.it S.Surminski GranthamResearch InstituteonClimateChangeand theEnvironment, LondonSchoolofEconomicsandPoliticalScience (LSE),London,UK ©TheAuthor(s)2019 R.Mechler et al. (eds.),LossandDamage fromClimateChange,ClimateRisk Management,PolicyandGovernance,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_6 155
back to the  book Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options"
Loss and Damage from Climate Change Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
Title
Loss and Damage from Climate Change
Subtitle
Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
Authors
Reinhard Mechler
Laurens M. Bouwer
Thomas Schinko
Swenja Surminski
JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer
Publisher
Springer Open
Date
2019
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-319-72026-5
Size
16.0 x 24.0 cm
Pages
580
Keywords
Environment, Climate change, Environmental law, Environmental policy, Risk management
Categories
International
Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Loss and Damage from Climate Change