Page - 438 - in Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options

438 M.LandauerandS. Juhola Table18.2 Examples limitingArctic communities toadapt toclimatechange Examplespreventingadaptationor leading tonegative consequencesofadaptationactions Author (publicationyear) Inadequate institutional andfinancingmechanismssuchas federal fundingprocedures fordisasterpreventionand recovery Bronen (2015) Disabilities todetermineandevaluatewhenpreventive actionsneeded Bronen (2015) Slowimplementationofactionsor statutoryand institutional barriers in implementation Bronen (2015) Lackinggovernance framework for theevaluationof risks and impacts Bronen (2015) Government fundingdoesnot reachArctic communities Lopez-Carr andMarten-Kenyon (2015) Inequityand injustice related tocurrent actions KingstonandMarino (2010) Mis- andunder-representationof localvoices inpolitical arenas Marino (2012) Lackofadaptationassistancewhenonlyavailable for formal stateactors Shearer (2012) Inadequateaccommodationofclimatechangescenarios into disaster riskprotocols Marino (2012) Unclear responsibilitiesofgovernmentor lacking governmentbody to implementactions Shearer (2012) Lackofpreventivedisasterprogramsand funds Shearer (2012) Missing international support regardingcapacitybuilding for adaptationactions Marino (2012),Shearer (2012) Traditional and indigenousknowledgenot considered in planningactions Shearer (2012) Lackingnetworksofmultipleanddiverseorganisations to buildadaptivecapacityandbalancebetweendifferent interestgroups Bronen (2015) Migrationstrategiesnot considered indisaster risk reduction andadaptationprograms Dengler et al. (2014) Difficulties tomonetise lossofhealthandsocial cohesion Dengler et al. (2014) Unclearor inadequateallocationof funding fordisaster mitigation (for example, erosionnot included, although it canbeoneof themost significanthazards in someregions) BronenandChapin III (2013) Full integrationofhazardmitigationplanning into comprehensive riskassessments is considered tooexpensive and time intensive BronenandChapin III (2013) Allocationof fundingoftenbasedoncost-benefit ratios which leavesout remotecommunitieswith lowpopulation densities (seenashighcosts and lowbenefits) BronenandChapin III (2013)