Page - 110 - in Mobile Culture Studies - The Journal, Volume 4/2018

110 Mobile Culture Studies. The Journal 4 2o18 Graciela Susana Boruszko | Transliteratures This staging assembles at the same time a “not knowing” that is interested in listening or rea- ding a “knowledge” that represents the cultural and literary conceptions of the surroundings of the receptor. It is precisely in this ambivalent axe that the message is unfold in multiple layers in order to respond to a reception that is conceived at several levels. The semantic transfer is enriched by the intercultural and transliterary articulation and manifestation, as it involves not only the present time of the execution but the memories or the canonical readings that incite the receptors to travel between different times. Such complexity inflames those that being seduced by the “pursuing of knowledge” venture to live this unique experience that can only be repeated within new parameters. nativos digitales. El efecto más saludable ha sido la ten- dencia a las lecturas combinadas y trasver- sales, a la alimentación de modelos estéticos y literarios desde fuentes muy diversas.” (Gracia 1939-2010:272) “Todo relato parte de la realidad, pero esta- blece una relación distinta entre lo real y lo inventado: en el relato ficticio domina esto último; en el real, lo primero. Para crear la suya propia, el relato ficticio anhela eman- ciparse de la realidad; el real permanecer cosido a ella. Lo cierto es que ninguno de los dos puede satisfacer su ambición: el relato ficticio siempre mantendrá un vín- culo cierto con la realidad, porque de ella nace: el relato real, puesto que está hecho con palabras, inevitablemente se independ- iza en parte de la realidad. (…) No importa: después de todo, uno no viaja para llegar, sino para disfrutar el viaje.” (Cercas 200):13- 17) and they are digital natives.” (Translation by the author) “Every story opening up in reality estab- lishes a unique relation between that reality and what is fictional: in the fictional narra- tion fiction dominates; in the real narrative, reality. In order to create its own reality, the fictional narrative longs to emancipate itself of reality that represents permanence. The truth is that none of them could sat- isfy their ambition; the fictional narrative will always keep its ties with reality, because it was born in it: the reality’s narrative, because it is constructed with words, una- voidably frees itself from reality (…) It does not matter: after all, we do not journey to arrive, but rather to enjoy the trip.” (Translation by the author) The transliteratures are not only originated and received in intercultural spaces, but contrary to the physical restrictions that frame the individual, are spread in a space that trespasses the physical and geographical borders conquering a broader identitarian space. Technology com- prises that what is textual, mental, corporal, human and the technological in a virtual space that we perceived as natural and personal in spite of distances. This proliferation of spaces and frequencies creates in the individual a variety of answers to these intercultural exchanges that are experienced with a certain dose of aggressiveness since they are perceived as an invasion of what existing further away, all of a sudden is present in the proximity of the individual, while hastening through the process of elaborating an immediate response. Amelia Sanz Cobrerizo explains it further.