Page - 15 - in options, Volume summer 2019
Image of the Page - 15 -
Text of the Page - 15 -
© Adam Islaam | IIASA
variability, there is an increasing demand for
research that can help countries adapt
their agriculture to new, and potentially
unpredictable climate conditions.
Researchers in the IIASA Ecosystems
Services and Management (ESM) Program
use the Global Biosphere Management
Model (GLOBIOM) to incorporate different
dimensions into their analysis. The model
allows them to assess the impacts of climate
change on production, the influence of
various climate policies, and the impacts of
agriculture and different production methods
on land-use change and direct emissions to
build scenarios that can inform policy.
This systematic analysis is especially
important because of the many complex
interactions between food, water, energy,
and land use. Making policies to mitigate
climate change without understanding these
interconnections could create unanticipated
problems. For instance, a study led by IIASA
researcher Tomoko Hasegawa found that
taxes targeted at solving climate change
could lead to more food insecurity than the
impacts of climate change itself. A blanket
carbon tax would lead to increased food
prices, in particular on meat and rice,
which are responsible for a large share
of greenhouse gas emissions, and would
especially impact food availability in
developing countries.
Other studies, such as one published
in 2016, identified potential trade-offs
between policies designed to preserve
water and biodiversity, as well as address
climate change.
How systems analysis
informs solutions
While research results that identify tradeoffs
and unintended impacts of well-intentioned
policies can seem dismaying, it is the first
step to finding solutions to complex global
challenges like food security.
IIASA systems analysis methods allow
researchers to examine the impacts of many
potential policies, with many variations in
climate, energy, and population scenarios,
allowing them to understand the broader
impact of potential policy solutions.
On a global scale, recent studies from the
ESM team are showing the potential of both
changes in diet (towards a more vegetarian
diet) and changes in production that make agriculture more efficient, particularly in the
livestock sector. Combinations of incentives
and taxes could help achieve these shifts.
IIASA researchers are also applying their
research at a national scale to help countries
build “climate smart” agricultural policies
that can help them increase domestic food
production while reducing the climate
impact of agriculture. IIASA researcher
Amanda Palazzo, for example, led an analysis
used by the World Bank and the Agricultural
Ministry of Zambia in a new agricultural plan
for the country.
Towards zero hunger
One of the most frustrating aspects of the
challenge of food security is that there is
enough food on the planet today to feed
every person. Due to distribution challenges,
inequity, inadequate storage, and waste, we
however don’t even come close to putting
food on everyone’s plate.
There is of course no simple solution.
Policies need to take the links between
agriculture and climate change into account,
and recognize that solutions will involve
attention to agricultural production, diet,
trade, and issues of access. Researchers also
point to education as a major area that could
help change habits and lead to healthier,
more sustainable diets.
“People need to realize that their diets have
an important impact both on the planet and
on their health,” says Valin. “Habits have deep
cultural roots, and it’s hard to accept that the
ways we satisfy our appetite can have long
term personal and large-scale impacts.”
Further info:
Hasegawa T, Fujimori S,
HavlĂk P, Valin H, Bodirsky
BL, Doelman JC, Fellmann
T, Kyle P et al. (2018).
Risk of increased food
insecurity under stringent
global climate change
mitigation policy.
Nature Climate Change
8(8): 699-703
[pure.iiasa.ac.at/15389]
Luan Y, Fischer G, Wada Y,
Sun L, & Shi P (2018).
Quantifying the impact
of diet quality on hunger
and undernutrition.
Journal of Cleaner
Production 205: 432-446.
[pure.iiasa.ac.at/15476]
Muttarak R (2018).
Too few nutrients and too
many calories: climate
change and the double
burden of malnutrition
in Asia. Asian Population
Studies: 1-7. (In Press)
[pure.iiasa.ac.at/15575]
Rao N, Min J, DeFries R,
Ghosh-Jerath S, Valin H,
& Fanzo J (2018).
Healthy, affordable
and climate-friendly
diets in India.
Global Environmental
Change 49: 154-165.
[pure.iiasa.ac.at/15167]
World Bank (2019).
Climate-Smart Agriculture
Investment Plan Zambia:
Analyses to support
the climate-smart
development of Zambia’s
agriculture sector.
Raya Muttarak:
muttarak@iiasa.ac.at
Hugo Valin:
valin@iiasa.ac.at
Yibo Luan:
whuyimu@hotmail.com
Narasimha Rao:
nrao@iiasa.ac.at
www.iiasa.ac.at 15OptionsSummer
2019
back to the
book options, Volume summer 2019"
options
Volume summer 2019
- Title
- options
- Volume
- summer 2019
- Location
- Laxenburg
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC 4.0
- Size
- 21.0 x 29.7 cm
- Pages
- 32
- Categories
- Zeitschriften Options Magazine