Page - 30 - in Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education

2 OpenScienceandRadicalSolutions forDiversity,Equity… 31 Cook,B.G.,&Therrien,W.J.(2017).Nulleffectsandpublicationbiasinspecialeducationresearch. Behavioral Disorders, 42,149–158.https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917709473. Cook, B.G., Lloyd, J.W.,Mellor, D., Nosek, B.A.,&Therrien,W. J. (2018). Promoting open science to increase the trustworthiness of evidence in special education.Exceptional Children, 85(1), 104–118.https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918793138. Cribb, J.,&Sari,T. (2010).Openscience:Sharingknowledge in theglobalcentury.Collingwood: CSIROPublishing. Czarnitzki,D.,Grimpe,C.,&Pellens,M. (2015).Access to research inputs:Open scienceversus theentrepreneurialuniversity.Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(6), 1050–1063. David,P.A.(1998).Commonagencycontractingandtheemergenceof‘openscience’ institutions. AmericanEconomic Review,88(2), 15–21. David, P. A. (2004a). Understanding the emergence of ‘open science’ institutions: Functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 571–589. https://doi. org/10.1093/icc/dth023. David,P.A.(2004b).Can“OpenScience”beprotectedfromtheevolvingregimeofIPRprotections? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160(1), 9–34. David,P.A. (2007).TheHistoricalOriginsof ‘OpenScience’.Anessayonpatronage, reputation, and common agencycontracting in the scientific revolution. Stanford,CA:StanfordUniversity. Deming,W.E. (1982).Quality, productivityand competitiveposition.Cambridge,MA:MIT. Deming,W.E. (1986).Out of theCrisis.Cambridge,MA:MIT. Donabedian,A.(1980).Thedefinitionofqualityandapproaches to itsassessment [Explorations in QualityAssessment andMonitoring,vol. 1].AnnArbor:HealthAdministrationPress. Dorch,B. (2012).On the citation advantage of linking to data.Retrieved fromhttps://hal-hprints. archives-ouvertes.fr/hprints-00714715/document. Dosemagen, S., Liboiron,M., &Molloy, J. (2017). Gathering for open science hardware 2016. Journal of Open Hardware, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/joh.5. Ebersole, C.R.,Atherton,O.E., Belanger,A. L., Skulborstad,H.M.,Allen, J.M.,Banks, J. B., et al. (2016).Many labs3:Evaluatingparticipantpoolquality across theacademic semestervia replication.JournalofExperimentalSocialPsychology,67,68–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp. 2015.10.012. EuropeanCommission. (2015). Study on open science. Impact, implications and policy options. Brussels:EuropeanCommission.Retrievedfromhttps://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/ pdf/expert-groups/rise/study_on_open_science-impact_implications_and_policy_options- salmi_072015.pdf. Fanelli,D. (2010).“Positive”results increasedownthehierarchyof thesciences.PLoSONE,5(4), e10068.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068. Fecher,B.,&Friesike,S. (2014).Openscience:One term,five schoolsof thought. InS.Bartling, &S.Friesike(Eds.),Openingscience (pp.17–47).Cham:Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-00026-8_2. Ferguson, C. J.,&Heene,M. (2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’saversion to thenull.PerspectivesonPsychologicalScience,7,555–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459059. Feyerabend,P. (1978).Science in a free society.London:NewLeftBooks. Franco,A.,Malhotra,N.,&Simonovits,G.(2014).Publicationbiasinthesocialsciences:Unlocking thefiledrawer.Science,345,1502–1505.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484. Gilmore,R.O.,Kennedy, J. L.,&Adolph,K.E. (2018). Practical solutions for sharing data and materials from psychological research. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,1,121–130.https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917746500. Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Science or art? How aesthetic standards grease the way through the publicationbottleneckbutunderminescience.PerspectivesonPsychologicalScience,7,562–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612457576. Goodman,S.N.,Fanelli,D.,&Ioannidis,J.P.A.(2016).Whatdoesresearchreproducibilitymean? ScienceTranslationalMedicine,8(341),341ps12.https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027.