Page - 131 - in Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education
Image of the Page - 131 -
Text of the Page - 131 -
138 H.ChaandH.-J.So
9.2.2 ComparisonofTraditional,Blended,andFlipped
Learning
For a clear conceptualizationof integratingMOOCs inhigher education,wefirstly
contrast the characteristics (a) traditional instruction, (b) blended learning, and (c)
flipped learning.First, traditional instructioncanbedescribedasadirect instruction
approach,wherean instructormainlydelivers a face-to-face lecture inaclassroom.
Students learnmainlythroughtextbooks, lectures,andassignments intheclassroom
setting. It is important to acknowledge that direct instruction or an instructor-led
lectureisnotinitselfgoodorbad.Thereissufficientevidencethatdirectinstructionis
effectivefordeliveringdeclarativeknowledge to learnersandfor reducingcognitive
load (Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006). Rather, the critics of direct instruction
are associated with the lack of time devoted to high-order cognitive skills, such
as applying, analyzing, and evaluating, sincemost of the class time is devoted to
transmittingcontentknowledge inan instructor-centricmode (Kuhn,2007).
Second, blended learning refers to the combination of face-to-face instruction
and computer-mediated instruction (Graham, 2006). The term blended learning is
widelyusedboth in researchandpractices.Howecer, it ischallenging todistinguish
flippedlearningandblendedlearningsincebothapproachesinvolveonlineandface-
to-face (F2F) learning activities. Although flipped learning is perceived as a form
of blending online andoffline learning (Strayer, 2012), some scholars have argued
thatflipped learningdiffers fromblended learningbyclearly separatingonline and
offlineactivities(Hwang&Lai,2017).Forinstance,Thai,Wever,andValcke(2017)
compare a flipped classroomwith other similar learning approaches that combine
face-to-faceandonlinelearningcomponents.Table9.1showsthat thekeydifference
betweenblended learningand theflippedclassroomis reversing theorderofonline
and face-to-face settings inpresenting lectures andguidingquestions, aswell as in
the immediacy of a feedback loop. That is, in the flipped classroom, lectures are
deliveredonline,andguidingquestions thatscaffoldstudents’deeperunderstanding
aboutknowledgeacquiredfromthelecturevideosoccur inaface-to-facemodewith
immediate feedback.
Lastly,itispossiblethatin-classteachingofflippedlearningremainsaninstructor-
centeredapproachwheninstructorsfocusmainlyonreviewingthecontentthatlearn-
ers havealready learned through lecturevideosbefore class.With that, theFlipped
Table9.1 Comparisonofthemaincharacteristicsofvariouslearningapproaches(Thaietal.,2017)
Traditional
learning e-learning Blended learningconditions
Blended learning Flipped
classroom
Lecture F2F Online F2F Online
Guiding
questions F2F Online Online F2F
Feedback F2F immediate Onlinedelayed Onlinedelayed F2F immediate
Radical Solutions and Open Science
An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education
- Title
- Radical Solutions and Open Science
- Subtitle
- An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education
- Editor
- Daniel Burgos
- Publisher
- Springer Open
- Date
- 2020
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-981-15-4276-3
- Size
- 16.0 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 200
- Category
- Informatik