Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education
Page - 131 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 131 - in Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education

Image of the Page - 131 -

Image of the Page - 131 - in Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education

Text of the Page - 131 -

138 H.ChaandH.-J.So 9.2.2 ComparisonofTraditional,Blended,andFlipped Learning For a clear conceptualizationof integratingMOOCs inhigher education,wefirstly contrast the characteristics (a) traditional instruction, (b) blended learning, and (c) flipped learning.First, traditional instructioncanbedescribedasadirect instruction approach,wherean instructormainlydelivers a face-to-face lecture inaclassroom. Students learnmainlythroughtextbooks, lectures,andassignments intheclassroom setting. It is important to acknowledge that direct instruction or an instructor-led lectureisnotinitselfgoodorbad.Thereissufficientevidencethatdirectinstructionis effectivefordeliveringdeclarativeknowledge to learnersandfor reducingcognitive load (Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006). Rather, the critics of direct instruction are associated with the lack of time devoted to high-order cognitive skills, such as applying, analyzing, and evaluating, sincemost of the class time is devoted to transmittingcontentknowledge inan instructor-centricmode (Kuhn,2007). Second, blended learning refers to the combination of face-to-face instruction and computer-mediated instruction (Graham, 2006). The term blended learning is widelyusedboth in researchandpractices.Howecer, it ischallenging todistinguish flippedlearningandblendedlearningsincebothapproachesinvolveonlineandface- to-face (F2F) learning activities. Although flipped learning is perceived as a form of blending online andoffline learning (Strayer, 2012), some scholars have argued thatflipped learningdiffers fromblended learningbyclearly separatingonline and offlineactivities(Hwang&Lai,2017).Forinstance,Thai,Wever,andValcke(2017) compare a flipped classroomwith other similar learning approaches that combine face-to-faceandonlinelearningcomponents.Table9.1showsthat thekeydifference betweenblended learningand theflippedclassroomis reversing theorderofonline and face-to-face settings inpresenting lectures andguidingquestions, aswell as in the immediacy of a feedback loop. That is, in the flipped classroom, lectures are deliveredonline,andguidingquestions thatscaffoldstudents’deeperunderstanding aboutknowledgeacquiredfromthelecturevideosoccur inaface-to-facemodewith immediate feedback. Lastly,itispossiblethatin-classteachingofflippedlearningremainsaninstructor- centeredapproachwheninstructorsfocusmainlyonreviewingthecontentthatlearn- ers havealready learned through lecturevideosbefore class.With that, theFlipped Table9.1 Comparisonofthemaincharacteristicsofvariouslearningapproaches(Thaietal.,2017) Traditional learning e-learning Blended learningconditions Blended learning Flipped classroom Lecture F2F Online F2F Online Guiding questions F2F Online Online F2F Feedback F2F immediate Onlinedelayed Onlinedelayed F2F immediate
back to the  book Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education"
Radical Solutions and Open Science An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education
Title
Radical Solutions and Open Science
Subtitle
An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education
Editor
Daniel Burgos
Publisher
Springer Open
Date
2020
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-981-15-4276-3
Size
16.0 x 24.1 cm
Pages
200
Category
Informatik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Radical Solutions and Open Science