Page - 47 - in Reflective Cosmopolitanism - Educating towards inclusive communities through Philosophical Enquiry
Image of the Page - 47 -
Text of the Page - 47 -
ELLA (MANUAL) 47
When we pre-judge we draw conclusions based on personal opinions or feelings be-
fore knowing facts and without any knowledge, factual reasons or objective considerations.
The friend of Dina´s mother was pre-judging Dinaâs relatives without knowing them
or knowing their background. People who grow up in different countries and communities
have different rules for interacting and dressing. They are exposed to different discussions
and have different beliefs and values.
You can also find resources for the concept of âprejudiceâ in the manual to Christian,
episode 2, leading idea 1 âPrejudice â getting to know the otherâ; and to the manual to In
and out of the park, episode 5, leading idea 2 âThe pre-judgment/prejudiceâ and in the
manual to www.whatsyourname.you, episode 5.
Discussion Plan: Prejudices
1. What are prejudices?
2. What is the meaning of âpre-judgingâ?
3. What kind of prejudices do you know?
4. What kind of prejudices exist in our country?
5. What images come to your mind when you hear the word âprejudiceâ?
Leading Idea 6: Reasoning
When we behave in a questionable or uncertain way, we often ask ourselves for reasons,
because we want to justify our actions or we want to find out if we imply or assume some-
thing. We also want to know if there are perhaps more plausible possibilities. We give
reasons for our actions, but are these reasons always âgoodâ reasons?
When can we say that a reason is a âgoodâ reason? There must be certain conditions
for calling a reason a âgoodâ reason â a. it should be relevant and connected to the issue
and context â b. it should be plausible and credible â and c. it should be strong enough as
an adequate justification in a certain context/ situation.
There are varying degrees of strength and weakness in inductive reasoning and vari-
ous types including statistical syllogism, arguments from example, causal inferences,
simple inductions, and inductive generalizations. They can have part to whole relations,
extrapolations, or predictions.
You can also find resources on the concept of âreasonsâ in the manual to Christian, epi-
sode 3, leading idea 2 âGood reasonsâ, Tina & Amir, episode 2, leading idea 1, discussion
plan âReasons for decision-makingâ and in the manual to Hanadi, episode 3, leading idea
2 âCorrelation, causes, reasonsâ, Episode 7, leading idea 1 âReasonsâ.
In order to address the topic of hypothetical reasoning, you can also refer to the Hanadi
manual, episode 6, leading idea 2 âHypothetical syllogism, ifâŚthenâŚâ.
Discussion Plan: Giving reasons
Are the following people giving good reasons for their actions? Please give a good
reason for your answer!
1. Maria says: âThey should not wear a scarf around their head because they are in
our country now.â
back to the
book Reflective Cosmopolitanism - Educating towards inclusive communities through Philosophical Enquiry"
Reflective Cosmopolitanism
Educating towards inclusive communities through Philosophical Enquiry
- Title
- Reflective Cosmopolitanism
- Subtitle
- Educating towards inclusive communities through Philosophical Enquiry
- Editor
- Ediciones La Rectoral
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
- Size
- 21.0 x 29.7 cm
- Pages
- 172
- Categories
- International
- LehrbĂźcher PEACE Projekt