Page - 3 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Image of the Page - 3 -
Text of the Page - 3 -
Energies2018,11, 2226
inequalities [20,21]. Focusedon the advantages of theLS-SVRmodel todealwith suchproblems,
thispapertriestosimulatethenonlinearsystemoftheMELtimeseriestoreceivetheforecastingvalues
andimprovethe forecastingaccuracy.However, thedisadvantagesof theSVR-basedmodels in load
forecastingare thatwhenthesamplesizeof the load is large, the timeofsystemlearningandtraining
ishighly time-consuming,andthedeterminationofparametersmainlydependsontheexperienceof
theresearchers. Thishasacertaindegreeof influenceontheaccuracy in loadforecasting. Therefore,
exploringmoresuitableparameterdeterminationmethodshasalwaysbeenaneffectivewaytoimprove
the forecastingaccuracyof theSVR-basedmodels. Todeterminemoreappropriateparametersof the
SVR-basedmodels,Hongandhiscolleagueshaveconductedresearchusingdifferentevolutionary
algorithmshybridizedwithanSVRmodel[22–24]. Inthemeantime,Hongandhissuccessorshavealso
applieddifferentchaoticmappingfunctions(includingthelogisticfunction[22,23]andthecatmapping
function[10]) todiversify thepopulationduringmodelingprocesses,andthecloudtheorytomake
sure the temperaturecontinuouslydecreasesduringtheannealingprocess, eventuallydeterminingthe
mostappropriateparameters toreceivemoresatisfactory forecastingaccuracy[10].
The fruitflyoptimizationalgorithm(FOA) isanewswarmintelligentoptimizationalgorithm
proposed in 2011, it searches for global optimization based on fruit fly foraging behavior [25,26].
The algorithmhas only four control parameters [27]. Comparedwith other algorithms, FOAhas
theadvantagesofbeingeasytoprogramandhavingfewerparameters, lesscomputation,andhigh
accuracy [28,29]. FOAbelongs to thedomainofevolutionarycomputation; it realizes theoptimization
ofcomplexproblemsbysimulatingfruitflies tosearchfor foodsourcesbyusingolfactionandvision.
It has been successfully applied to thepredictive control fields [30,31]. However, similar to those
swarmintelligentoptimizationalgorithmswith iterativesearchingmechanisms, thestandardFOA
alsohasdrawbacks such as apremature convergent tendency, a slowconvergent rate in the later
searchingstage,andpoor local searchperformance [32].
Quantumcomputinghasbecomeoneof the leadingbranchesof science in themoderneradueto
itspowerful computingability. Thisnotonlypromptedus tostudynewquantumalgorithms,butalso
inspiredus to re-examine some traditional optimizationalgorithms fromthequantumcomputing
mechanism. Thequantumcomputingmechanism(QCM)makes fulluseof the superpositionand
coherence of quantum states. Compared with other evolutionary algorithms, the QCM uses a
novel encodingmethod—quantumbit encoding. Through the encoding of qubits, an individual
can characterize any linear superposition state, whereas traditional encodingmethods can only
representonespecificone.Asaresult,withQCMit iseasier tomaintainpopulationdiversity than
with other traditional evolutionary algorithms. Nowadays, it has become ahot topic of research
thatQCMisable tohybridizewithevolutionaryalgorithms to receivemore satisfactory searching
results. The literature [33] introducedQCMintogeneticalgorithmsandproposedquantumderived
geneticalgorithm(QIGA).Fromthepointofviewofalgorithmicmechanism, it isverysimilar to the
isolatednichesgeneticalgorithm.HanandKim[34]proposedageneticquantumalgorithm(GQA)
based onQCM.Comparedwith traditional evolutionary algorithms, its greatest advantage is its
betterability tomaintainpopulationdiversity.HanandKim[35] further introducedthepopulation
migrationmechanismbasedonure [34], andrenamedthealgorithmaquantumevolutionalgorithm
(QEA).Huang[36],LeeandLin[37,38],andLietal. [39]hybridizedtheparticleswamoptimization
(PSO)algorithm,Tabusearch(TS)algorithm,geneticalgorithm(GA),andbatalgorithm(BA)with the
QCMandthecatmappingfunction,andproposedtheCQPSO,CQTS,CQGA,andCQBAalgorithms,
whichwere employed to select the appropriate parameters of an SVRmodel. The results of the
application indicate that the improvedalgorithmsobtainmoreappropriateparameters,andhigher
forecastingaccuracy is achieved. Theaboveapplications also reveal that the improvedalgorithm,
byhybridizingwithQCM,couldeffectivelyavoid localoptimalpositionandprematureconvergence.
1.3. Contributions
Considering the inherent drawback of the FOA, i.e., suffering frompremature convergence,
thispaper tries tohybridize theFOAwithQCMandthecat chaoticmapping function tosolve the
3
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Title
- Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Authors
- Wei-Chiang Hong
- Ming-Wei Li
- Guo-Feng Fan
- Editor
- MDPI
- Location
- Basel
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-03897-583-0
- Size
- 17.0 x 24.4 cm
- Pages
- 448
- Keywords
- Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
- Category
- Informatik