Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Page - 32 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 32 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Image of the Page - 32 -

Image of the Page - 32 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Text of the Page - 32 -

Energies2018,11, 1009 3.2.2. ForecastingAccuracyIndexes Three forecastingaccuracyevaluation indexesareusedtocompare the forecastingperformances foreachmodel: (1) theMAPEmentionedinEquation(5); (2) therootmeansquareerror (RMSE);and (3) themeanabsoluteerror (MAE).The latter twoindexescouldbecalculatedbyEquations (18)and (19), respectively: RMSE= √ ∑Ni=1(ai− fi)2 N s (18) MAE= 1 N N ∑ i=1 |ai− fi| (19) whereN is the totalnumberofdata; ai is theactualelectric loadvalueatpoint i; fi is the forecasted electric loadvalueatpoint i. 3.2.3. ForecastingAccuracySignificanceTests TodemonstratethesignificantsuperiorityoftheproposedSSVRCCSmodel intermsofforecasting accuracy, somefamousstatistical testsare implemented. BasedonDieboldandMariano’s [50]and Derracetal. [51] researchsuggestions, theWilcoxonsigned-ranktest [52]andFriedmantest [53]are simultaneouslyapplied in thispaper. TheWilcoxonsigned-ranktest isusedtocompare thesignificantdifferences in termsofcentral tendencybetween twodata setwith the same size. Let di represent the i-thpair difference of the i-th forecastingerrors fromanytwoforecastingmodels, thedifferencesarerankedaccordingto their absolutevalues. Let r+ represent the sumof ranks that thefirstmodel larger than the secondone; r− represent the sumof ranks that the secondmodel larger than the first one. In case of dj = 0, then,excludethe j-thpairandreducesamplesize. ThestatisticWof theWilcoxonsigned-ranktest is shownasEquation(20): W=min { r+,r− } (20) IfWmeets thecriterionof theWilcoxondistributionunderNdegreesof freedom, then, thenull hypothesisofequalperformanceof these twocomparedmodelscannotbeaccepted. Italso implies that theproposedmodel is significantly superior to theothermodel. Of course, if the comparison size is larger thanthecritical size, thesamplingdistributionofWwouldapproximate to thenormal distribution insteadofWilcoxondistribution,andtheassociatedp-valuewouldalsobeprovided. Ontheotherhand,dueto thenon-parametric statistical test in theANOVAanalysisprocedure, the Friedman test is devoted to compare the significant differences among two ormoremodels. ThestatisticFof theFriedmantest is shownasEquation(21): F= 12N k(k+1) [ k ∑ j=1 R2j− k(k+1)2 4 ] (21) whereN isthetotalnumberofforecastingresults;k isthenumberofcomparedmodels;Rj istheaverage ranksumobtainedineachforecastingvalue foreachcomparedmodelasshowninEquation(22), Rj= 1 N N ∑ i=1 rji (22) where rji is theranksumfrom1(thesmallest forecastingerror) tok (theworst forecastingerror) for ith forecastingresult, for jthcomparedmodel. Similarly, if theassociatedp-valueofFmeets thecriterionofnotacceptance, thenullhypothesis, equalperformanceamongall comparedmodels, couldalsonotbeheld. 32
back to the  book Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies"
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Title
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Authors
Wei-Chiang Hong
Ming-Wei Li
Guo-Feng Fan
Editor
MDPI
Location
Basel
Date
2019
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-583-0
Size
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Pages
448
Keywords
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Category
Informatik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies