Page - 32 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Image of the Page - 32 -
Text of the Page - 32 -
Energies2018,11, 1009
3.2.2. ForecastingAccuracyIndexes
Three forecastingaccuracyevaluation indexesareusedtocompare the forecastingperformances
foreachmodel: (1) theMAPEmentionedinEquation(5); (2) therootmeansquareerror (RMSE);and
(3) themeanabsoluteerror (MAE).The latter twoindexescouldbecalculatedbyEquations (18)and
(19), respectively:
RMSE= √
∑Ni=1(ai− fi)2
N s (18)
MAE= 1
N N
∑
i=1 |ai− fi| (19)
whereN is the totalnumberofdata; ai is theactualelectric loadvalueatpoint i; fi is the forecasted
electric loadvalueatpoint i.
3.2.3. ForecastingAccuracySignificanceTests
TodemonstratethesignificantsuperiorityoftheproposedSSVRCCSmodel intermsofforecasting
accuracy, somefamousstatistical testsare implemented. BasedonDieboldandMariano’s [50]and
Derracetal. [51] researchsuggestions, theWilcoxonsigned-ranktest [52]andFriedmantest [53]are
simultaneouslyapplied in thispaper.
TheWilcoxonsigned-ranktest isusedtocompare thesignificantdifferences in termsofcentral
tendencybetween twodata setwith the same size. Let di represent the i-thpair difference of the
i-th forecastingerrors fromanytwoforecastingmodels, thedifferencesarerankedaccordingto their
absolutevalues. Let r+ represent the sumof ranks that thefirstmodel larger than the secondone;
r− represent the sumof ranks that the secondmodel larger than the first one. In case of dj = 0,
then,excludethe j-thpairandreducesamplesize. ThestatisticWof theWilcoxonsigned-ranktest is
shownasEquation(20):
W=min { r+,r− }
(20)
IfWmeets thecriterionof theWilcoxondistributionunderNdegreesof freedom, then, thenull
hypothesisofequalperformanceof these twocomparedmodelscannotbeaccepted. Italso implies
that theproposedmodel is significantly superior to theothermodel. Of course, if the comparison
size is larger thanthecritical size, thesamplingdistributionofWwouldapproximate to thenormal
distribution insteadofWilcoxondistribution,andtheassociatedp-valuewouldalsobeprovided.
Ontheotherhand,dueto thenon-parametric statistical test in theANOVAanalysisprocedure,
the Friedman test is devoted to compare the significant differences among two ormoremodels.
ThestatisticFof theFriedmantest is shownasEquation(21):
F= 12N
k(k+1) [
k
∑
j=1 R2j− k(k+1)2
4 ]
(21)
whereN isthetotalnumberofforecastingresults;k isthenumberofcomparedmodels;Rj istheaverage
ranksumobtainedineachforecastingvalue foreachcomparedmodelasshowninEquation(22),
Rj= 1
N N
∑
i=1 rji (22)
where rji is theranksumfrom1(thesmallest forecastingerror) tok (theworst forecastingerror) for ith
forecastingresult, for jthcomparedmodel.
Similarly, if theassociatedp-valueofFmeets thecriterionofnotacceptance, thenullhypothesis,
equalperformanceamongall comparedmodels, couldalsonotbeheld.
32
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Title
- Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Authors
- Wei-Chiang Hong
- Ming-Wei Li
- Guo-Feng Fan
- Editor
- MDPI
- Location
- Basel
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-03897-583-0
- Size
- 17.0 x 24.4 cm
- Pages
- 448
- Keywords
- Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
- Category
- Informatik