Page - 188 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Image of the Page - 188 -
Text of the Page - 188 -
Energies2018,11, 2008
dayswithhigher loads. Thesedaysare important, as theyarewhennaturalgas is themostexpensive,
whichmeans thatpurchasinggason thespotmarketorhavingbought toomuchgascanbecostly.
Unfortunately,RMSE ismagnitudedependent,meaningthat largersystemshave largerRMSE if the
percent error is constant,whichmakes it apoormetric for comparing theperformanceof amodel
acrossdifferentsystems.
Anothercommonmetric forevaluatingforecasts ismeanabsolutepercenterror,
MAPE=100 1
N N
∑
n=1 |sˆ(n)−s(n)|
s(n) . (12)
UnlikeRMSE,MAPE isunitlessandnotdependentonthemagnitudeof thesystem.Thismeans
that it ismoreuseful forcomparing theperformanceofamethodbetweenoperatingareas. Itdoes,
however,putsomeemphasisonthe lowestflowdays,which,ontopofbeingthe least importantdays
to forecast correctly, areoften theeasiestdays to forecast. Assuch,MAPE isnot thebestmetric for
lookingat theperformanceof themodelacrossall thedays inayear,butcanbeusedtodescribe the
performanceonasubsetof similardays.
Theerrormetricused in thispaper isweightedMAPE:
WMAPE=100 N
∑
n=1 |sˆ(n)−s(n)|
N
∑
n=1 s(n) (13)
Thiserrormetricdoesnotemphasize the lowflowandless importantdayswhilebeingunitless
andindependentof themagnitudeof thesystem.Thismeans that it is themosteffectiveerrormetric
forcomparingtheperformanceofourmethodsover thecourseofa fullyear.
Themeanandstandarddeviationof theperformanceof eachmodelover the62data sets are
shown in Table 1. As expected, theDNNhas a lowermeanWMAPE than the linear regression
andANNforecasters,meaning that generally, theDNNperformsbetter than the simplermodels.
Additionally, the largeDNNmarginallyoutperformsthesmallDNNintermsofWMAPE.Bothresults
are shown tobe statistically significant later in this section. In addition to themean, the standard
deviationof theperformancesof the twoDNNarchitecturesaresmaller thanthatof theLRandANN.
This isan important resultbecause itpoints toamoreconsistentperformanceacrossdifferentareasas
wellasbetterperformanceoverall.
Table1.Themeanandstandarddeviationof theperformanceof the fourmodelsonall62areas.
LRWMAPE ANNWMAPE DNNWMAPE LargeDNNWMAPE
Mean 6.41 6.41 5.78 5.58
StandardDeviation 2.49 2.83 2.11 2.09
Simplystatingthemeanperformancedoesnot tellusmuchwithout lookingat thedifferences
in performance for each of the 62 areas individually, which is shown succinctly in Figures 6
and7. Figure 6a,b andFigure 7 arehistogramsof thedifference inperformanceonall 62 areasof
twoforecastingmethods. Bypresenting theresults thisway,wecanvisualize thegeneraldifference in
performanceforeachofthe62operatingareas.Additionally, t-testscanbeperformedonthehistograms
todeterminethestatistical significanceof thedifference.Right-tailed t-testswereperformedonthe
distributionsinFigure6a,b. Theresultingp-valuesare1.2×10−7 and6.4×10−4, respectively,meaning
that theDNNperformedbetter, ingeneral, thantheANNorLR,andthat thedifferenceinperformance
is statisticallysignificant inbothcases.
188
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Title
- Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Authors
- Wei-Chiang Hong
- Ming-Wei Li
- Guo-Feng Fan
- Editor
- MDPI
- Location
- Basel
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-03897-583-0
- Size
- 17.0 x 24.4 cm
- Pages
- 448
- Keywords
- Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
- Category
- Informatik