Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Page - 258 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 258 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Image of the Page - 258 -

Image of the Page - 258 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Text of the Page - 258 -

Energies2018,11, 1678 the forecastsproducedfor4May.Onlytheheat loaduptothe timeof the forecastwasusedas input to produce the forecast. Realweather forecastswereusedasweather inputs for4May,asopposedto thehistoricalweatherdatausedfor training. It is clearhowthe three forecastmodelsproducesimilar, yetdistinct forecasts. On4May, theMLPmodelappears toproduce thebest forecast, especially in themorning. Figure4summarizes theperformanceof the threemodels in the threedifferentdatascenarios. The toppanel showsthe forecastperformance thatcouldbeachievedifweather forecastswere100% accurate, simulatedbyusinghistoricalweatherdata. Thebottompanel showstheperformanceusing realweather forecasts.Comparingthe threedatascenarios,wesee thebenefitof includingdifferent data types in themodeling. In thefirst scenario, only laggedheat loadandweatherdataareused as input. In thesecondscenario,genericcalendardata is includedaswell, andinthe thirdscenario, localobservances, nationalholidays, andschoolholidaysarealso includedas inputs to themodel. Includingcalendardatasignificantly improvesperformance, comparedtoonlyusingweatherdata. Extendingthe inputdatawithholidaydataaswell results inanadditional,butsmall improvement comparedtousinggenericcalendardataonly.Obtainingthe localholidaydatacanbe laboriousor impossible, so it ispositive toseegenericcalendardatayieldingcomparableresults. It ismucheasier toapply thesemodels toawiderangeofdistrictheatingsystemsaroundtheworld if it canbedone withoutcollecting localholidaydata. Figure3.Example forecasts for4May2016. The forecastswereproducedon3Mayat10:00andbased onrealweather forecasts, calendar,andholidaydata. Figure4allowsforcomparisonof theperformanceof the threemachine learningmodelsaswell. TheOLSmodelstandsoutbyperformingsignificantlyworsethantheothertwomodels inallscenarios. TheOLSmodel has a rootmean square error of 38.9MW, compared to 31.1MWand29.3MWfor theother twomodelswhenusingrealweather forecasts, calendar,andholidaydata (bottompanel). Thepoorperformanceof theOLSmodel canbeattributed to its linear structure. The relationship betweentheoutdoortemperatureandtheheat loadinatemperateclimate isnonlinear. Thiscauses the linearmodel toperformpoorlyduringsummerbyundershooting theheat loadandoverestimating its variance. The twononlinearmodels,MLPandSVR,performsimilarly in thesescenarios. TheSVR 258
back to the  book Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies"
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Title
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Authors
Wei-Chiang Hong
Ming-Wei Li
Guo-Feng Fan
Editor
MDPI
Location
Basel
Date
2019
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-583-0
Size
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Pages
448
Keywords
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Category
Informatik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies