Page - 275 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Image of the Page - 275 -
Text of the Page - 275 -
Energies2018,11, 1605
2.4. TheAlgorithmforStackingMulti-LearningEnsemble (SMLE)
In thisstudy,SMLEoffersadynamicELmethod.TheSMLRmethoddependsonthesequence
characteristic ofOCdata. For accurateOCprediction, we express the algorithmof SMLEwhen
predictingthenextmthmomentOCatthetime t. Thegeneraldesignoftheproposedmodelconsidered
bothdiversitymanagementandaccuracyenhancement forbasemodels.Here thealgorithmofSMLE
isdescribedbelowaspseudocode inAlgorithm1:
Algorithm1: StackingMulti-LearningEnsemble (SMLE).
Input:DatasetD={(x1,y1),(x2,y2), . . . ,(xm,ym)};
First-level learningalgorithmsL1,L2, . . . ,Ln;
Second-level learningalgorithmL;
Process:
%Trainafirst-level individual learnerht byapplying thefirst-level learningalgorithmLt to theoriginaldatasetD
for t=1,. . . ,T:
ht=Lt(D)
end;
%generate anewdata set
D′=φ;
for i=1,. . . ,m:
for t=1,. . . ,T:
zit= hi(xi) %Useht topredict trainingexample xi
end;
D′=D′∪{((zI1,zi2, . . . ,zT),yi)}
end;
%Train the second-level learnerh′byapplying the second-level learningalgorithmLto thenewdata setD′
h′=L(D′).
Output:H(x)= h′(h1(x1), . . . ,hT(xT))
3.Results
In this section, we evaluated variousmodels onGOC 52-year data sets using BPNN, SVR,
andLR as the basemodels to demonstrate their predictability of both single andEL forecasting.
Hence, there were single models used as benchmark model compared to ensemble predictors.
In the second experiment, we tested two classic ensemblemodels include bagging and additive
regression(AR).Moreover, the thirdexperiment testedthreeensemblemodelsbasedonSMLEscheme.
Toestablish thevalidityof theevaluatedmethod, a furtherprocedurewasdonebycomparing the
obtainedresultsof singlemodelswith theoutcomeof theensemblemodels. Evaluationcriteriawere
usedtocompareandanalyze theprediction, suchasT-Time,DA,MAPE,andED,whichareexcellent
methods forpredictingGOC.Meanwhile,wecompare theevaluationcriteriaofmultistep(10-ahead)
with single step (1-ahead) forecasting to find the better SMLEmodel for predictingGOC in both
short-term and term-long horizon situations. Finally, consumption growth rate evaluated for all
predictionoutcome.
3.1. SingleModelsResults
Regardingtheexperimentdesignandtheoverall stepsdescribedinSection2.2, thefirst test in
thisexperimentwas tocompare theperformanceofallbasemodelsseparately. Theoutputof10-fold
cross-validation tests runon the initial trainingwereused todeterminewhether eachmodelwas
sufficient forOCdata tomakethe forecastingresultsmorestable. Figure2apresents thecomparison
of thebest-obtainedresults fromallbasemodelswith therealOCdata. It isevident that theresults
obtainedaccording to theSVRmethodfor the52knownyears (1965–2016)wereclose to theactual
onesandcomparable to thoseproducedbytheBPNNandLRmodels.
275
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Title
- Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Authors
- Wei-Chiang Hong
- Ming-Wei Li
- Guo-Feng Fan
- Editor
- MDPI
- Location
- Basel
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-03897-583-0
- Size
- 17.0 x 24.4 cm
- Pages
- 448
- Keywords
- Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
- Category
- Informatik