Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Page - 275 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 275 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Image of the Page - 275 -

Image of the Page - 275 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Text of the Page - 275 -

Energies2018,11, 1605 2.4. TheAlgorithmforStackingMulti-LearningEnsemble (SMLE) In thisstudy,SMLEoffersadynamicELmethod.TheSMLRmethoddependsonthesequence characteristic ofOCdata. For accurateOCprediction, we express the algorithmof SMLEwhen predictingthenextmthmomentOCatthetime t. Thegeneraldesignoftheproposedmodelconsidered bothdiversitymanagementandaccuracyenhancement forbasemodels.Here thealgorithmofSMLE isdescribedbelowaspseudocode inAlgorithm1: Algorithm1: StackingMulti-LearningEnsemble (SMLE). Input:DatasetD={(x1,y1),(x2,y2), . . . ,(xm,ym)}; First-level learningalgorithmsL1,L2, . . . ,Ln; Second-level learningalgorithmL; Process: %Trainafirst-level individual learnerht byapplying thefirst-level learningalgorithmLt to theoriginaldatasetD for t=1,. . . ,T: ht=Lt(D) end; %generate anewdata set D′=φ; for i=1,. . . ,m: for t=1,. . . ,T: zit= hi(xi) %Useht topredict trainingexample xi end; D′=D′∪{((zI1,zi2, . . . ,zT),yi)} end; %Train the second-level learnerh′byapplying the second-level learningalgorithmLto thenewdata setD′ h′=L(D′). Output:H(x)= h′(h1(x1), . . . ,hT(xT)) 3.Results In this section, we evaluated variousmodels onGOC 52-year data sets using BPNN, SVR, andLR as the basemodels to demonstrate their predictability of both single andEL forecasting. Hence, there were single models used as benchmark model compared to ensemble predictors. In the second experiment, we tested two classic ensemblemodels include bagging and additive regression(AR).Moreover, the thirdexperiment testedthreeensemblemodelsbasedonSMLEscheme. Toestablish thevalidityof theevaluatedmethod, a furtherprocedurewasdonebycomparing the obtainedresultsof singlemodelswith theoutcomeof theensemblemodels. Evaluationcriteriawere usedtocompareandanalyze theprediction, suchasT-Time,DA,MAPE,andED,whichareexcellent methods forpredictingGOC.Meanwhile,wecompare theevaluationcriteriaofmultistep(10-ahead) with single step (1-ahead) forecasting to find the better SMLEmodel for predictingGOC in both short-term and term-long horizon situations. Finally, consumption growth rate evaluated for all predictionoutcome. 3.1. SingleModelsResults Regardingtheexperimentdesignandtheoverall stepsdescribedinSection2.2, thefirst test in thisexperimentwas tocompare theperformanceofallbasemodelsseparately. Theoutputof10-fold cross-validation tests runon the initial trainingwereused todeterminewhether eachmodelwas sufficient forOCdata tomakethe forecastingresultsmorestable. Figure2apresents thecomparison of thebest-obtainedresults fromallbasemodelswith therealOCdata. It isevident that theresults obtainedaccording to theSVRmethodfor the52knownyears (1965–2016)wereclose to theactual onesandcomparable to thoseproducedbytheBPNNandLRmodels. 275
back to the  book Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies"
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Title
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Authors
Wei-Chiang Hong
Ming-Wei Li
Guo-Feng Fan
Editor
MDPI
Location
Basel
Date
2019
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-583-0
Size
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Pages
448
Keywords
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Category
Informatik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies