Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Page - 280 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 280 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Image of the Page - 280 -

Image of the Page - 280 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Text of the Page - 280 -

Energies2018,11, 1605 Figure6. Illustrated10-aheadconsumptiondirectionalaccuracy(DA)of (a) singlemodels, (b) classic ensemblemodels,and(c)SMLEensemblemodels. Also, comparingdifferentpredictionhorizons, theshort-termpredictionhorizonshowedbetter performance for in all themodel see Table 4. Taking 1-step-ahead forecasting and an average of the10-step-aheadpredictions forexample, forall theSMLE–basedensemble,BPNN,SVR,bagging, ARmodels, the 1-step-ahead forecasting outperformed the average of the 10-step-ahead forecast, no matter the level accuracy or directional accuracy. Apart from the models mentioned above, SMLE-based ensembles andMLmodels and classic ensembles performed better in 1-step-ahead prediction given directional accuracy. However, from the point of level accuracy, both these approachesonlyhadslightsuperiority in6-step-aheadprediction. Except for theLR,whichperformed almost poorer in the 1-step-ahead compared to the averageof 10-step-aheadprediction as shown inFigure7a–c. Third, to furthervalidationofSMLEmodels forecasting, the t-testwasusedto test thestatistical significanceof thepredictionperformance. The t-test resultspresented inTable5, forall ensemble modelsunder this studywerenotsignificant (df =51,p-value>0.05)). Basedonthedetailedstatistical test,nosignificantdifferenceswereobservedbetweentheactualOCandthatpredictedbytheSMLE models. Themeandifferences in the last columnofTable5, indicate that in thepopulation fromwhere thesamplemodelsweredrawn, theactualandpredictedOCwasstatisticallysemi-equal. Therefore, itwaspossible toprove that theSMLEmodelwasuseful inpredictingOCbasedontheheterogeneous modelswithexcellent levelsofaccuracy(seeTable5). So,wecanconcludethat themodeldeveloped structure is sufficientwithmoreparameterssetting(i.e.,kernels,neuron) forOCprediction. Table5.The t-test resultsofactualandpredictedoil consumptionusingSMLEmodels. Model t p-Value MeanDifference 1stSMLE 0.227 0.823 0.8081 2ndSMLE 1.320 0.193 0.6803 3rdSMLE 0.728 0.470 0.6178 Theforecastedvalues foreachmodelandtotalOCgrowthrate from2017to2026 issummarized in Table 6. As seen from the table, allmodelswill still be increasing in the period from 2017 to 280
back to the  book Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies"
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Title
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Authors
Wei-Chiang Hong
Ming-Wei Li
Guo-Feng Fan
Editor
MDPI
Location
Basel
Date
2019
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-583-0
Size
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Pages
448
Keywords
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Category
Informatik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies