Page - 280 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Image of the Page - 280 -
Text of the Page - 280 -
Energies2018,11, 1605
Figure6. Illustrated10-aheadconsumptiondirectionalaccuracy(DA)of (a) singlemodels, (b) classic
ensemblemodels,and(c)SMLEensemblemodels.
Also, comparingdifferentpredictionhorizons, theshort-termpredictionhorizonshowedbetter
performance for in all themodel see Table 4. Taking 1-step-ahead forecasting and an average of
the10-step-aheadpredictions forexample, forall theSMLE–basedensemble,BPNN,SVR,bagging,
ARmodels, the 1-step-ahead forecasting outperformed the average of the 10-step-ahead forecast,
no matter the level accuracy or directional accuracy. Apart from the models mentioned above,
SMLE-based ensembles andMLmodels and classic ensembles performed better in 1-step-ahead
prediction given directional accuracy. However, from the point of level accuracy, both these
approachesonlyhadslightsuperiority in6-step-aheadprediction. Except for theLR,whichperformed
almost poorer in the 1-step-ahead compared to the averageof 10-step-aheadprediction as shown
inFigure7a–c.
Third, to furthervalidationofSMLEmodels forecasting, the t-testwasusedto test thestatistical
significanceof thepredictionperformance. The t-test resultspresented inTable5, forall ensemble
modelsunder this studywerenotsignificant (df =51,p-value>0.05)). Basedonthedetailedstatistical
test,nosignificantdifferenceswereobservedbetweentheactualOCandthatpredictedbytheSMLE
models. Themeandifferences in the last columnofTable5, indicate that in thepopulation fromwhere
thesamplemodelsweredrawn, theactualandpredictedOCwasstatisticallysemi-equal. Therefore,
itwaspossible toprove that theSMLEmodelwasuseful inpredictingOCbasedontheheterogeneous
modelswithexcellent levelsofaccuracy(seeTable5). So,wecanconcludethat themodeldeveloped
structure is sufficientwithmoreparameterssetting(i.e.,kernels,neuron) forOCprediction.
Table5.The t-test resultsofactualandpredictedoil consumptionusingSMLEmodels.
Model t p-Value MeanDifference
1stSMLE 0.227 0.823 0.8081
2ndSMLE 1.320 0.193 0.6803
3rdSMLE 0.728 0.470 0.6178
Theforecastedvalues foreachmodelandtotalOCgrowthrate from2017to2026 issummarized
in Table 6. As seen from the table, allmodelswill still be increasing in the period from 2017 to
280
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Title
- Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
- Authors
- Wei-Chiang Hong
- Ming-Wei Li
- Guo-Feng Fan
- Editor
- MDPI
- Location
- Basel
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-03897-583-0
- Size
- 17.0 x 24.4 cm
- Pages
- 448
- Keywords
- Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
- Category
- Informatik