Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Page - 282 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 282 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Image of the Page - 282 -

Image of the Page - 282 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Text of the Page - 282 -

Energies2018,11, 1605 Table6.Cont. Years Models BPNN LR SVR Bagging RF 1stSMLE 2ndSMLE 3rdSMLE 2022 4471.17 4915.79 4889.67 4956.50 4915.79 4967.25 4501.68 4602.70 2023 4496.30 4980.78 4954.70 5025.85 4980.78 5056.31 4519.38 4633.88 2024 4555.86 5052.61 5023.62 5095.53 5052.61 5029.93 4536.88 4635.57 2025 4578.78 5128.13 5097.75 5163.26 5128.13 4861.17 4553.77 4628.92 2026 4606.92 5205.40 5170.20 5215.23 5205.40 4615.31 4566.33 4659.36 2017–2026 0.74% 1.39% 1.38% 1.42% 1.39% 0.13% 0.38% 0.44% 1965–2016 2.2% 1.3% 1.8% 1.5% 1.6% 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% Figure 8. Illustrated annual CGR for 10-ahead consumption prediction using (a) single models (b) classicensemblemodels (c)SMLEmodels. We summarized all of the above results in Table 7 and Figure 9. In general, combining the forecastersusingSMLEwill significantly improvethefinalprediction.Generally, fromtheanalysisof theexperimentspresented in this study,wecandrawseveral importantconclusionsas follows: Firstly, theSMLE-basedBPNN-SVRmodelwassignificantlysuperior toallmodels in thisstudyregarding similarity, levelaccuracy,anddirectionaccuracy. Throughperformanceenhancement, theSMLE-based BPNN-SVRoutperformed othermodels at the 1.17 statistical significance level, compared to the best benchmarkmodels SVRandbagging, respectively. Secondly, the prediction performance of the SMLE-basedBPNN-SVR, SMLE-based SVRandSMLE-basedBPNNmodelswere better than thesingleandclassic ensemblemethods. These results indicate that thehybrid, basedonstacking method, can efficiently improve thepredictionperformance in the case ofOC. Thirdly, nonlinear models,withseasonaladjustment,weremoresuitableasbase learners for theensemble topredict the timeserieswithannualvolatility thanlinearmethods,duetopropertiesaboveofOC(i.e.,nonlinear andnon-stationary).However, computationally, thenewmethodconsumedmore timebecauseof its wayofsegmenting inputsandtheuseof theensemble. Fourthly, theaverageannual rateof totaloil demanddecreasedfrom1.8%between1965and2016 to0.91%between2017and2026. Finally,onone 282
back to the  book Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies"
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Title
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Authors
Wei-Chiang Hong
Ming-Wei Li
Guo-Feng Fan
Editor
MDPI
Location
Basel
Date
2019
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-583-0
Size
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Pages
448
Keywords
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Category
Informatik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies