Page - 232 - in The Future of Software Quality Assurance
Image of the Page - 232 -
Text of the Page - 232 -
232 E. van Veenendaal
vertical stroke in the letter I. There is ofcoursenothingwrong in beingan I-shaped
person—afunctionalexpert.However, let’s imagineanumberof functionalexperts
trying to work togetheron a new mobileapp. An app developer,an SEO expert, an
analytics expert, a contentdeveloper, and an art directorhave a kick-offmeeting to
decideona strategyfor thenewmobileapp.
The SEO expert insists that you should build the app around a keyword map
to make sure that the site’s structure mirrors an emphasis on keywords. The app
developer insists that the mobile app be as easy to code as possible. The analytics
expertsaysthat thenewdesignhastobebasedonwhat theappanalyticsshowabout
usage of the current app. The content developer insists it’s all about developing
interesting, engaging navigable content. And finally, the art director is insisting
that app composition and brand beauty is the number one goal. Which one of
these I-shaped people is right? How do we manage all these different opinionsand
make decisions? No matter how good the I-shaped functional experts are at their
individualfunctions,what they lack isnotonlyanappreciationof theirco-workers’
areas of expertise, but also the training to actually find solutions at the intersection
of their respective functionalareas.
Let’s now compare the I-shaped persons to those being T-shaped. A T-shaped
person is typically multi-function aware, collaborative and seeking to learn more
about how their function impacts others and the end product. T-shaped people are
far more flexible, and more able to easily catch on to new trends, but are of course
not as substantial in each adjacent discipline as in their primary skill. Contrary to
the I-shaped person, the T-shaped specialist tend to get the general picture rather
than immerse themselves indetails, unless it’s reallyneeded.
Inaddition to I-andT-shapedconcepts, therearedescriptivevariations thathave
emergedrecently, the mostcommonofwhichare (seeFig. 2):
• π-shaped—twolegsofkeyskills connectedwith thedashofgeneralknowledge
• M-shaped—three(ormore)key,deepskills
Although the concept of going beyond T-shaped, such as π-shaped or even
M-shaped is certainly an interesting one for some disciplines, it probably is not
the way to go for testers. As we have learned over the years a certain degree of
Fig. 2 Variations to the T-shaped concept
back to the
book The Future of Software Quality Assurance"
The Future of Software Quality Assurance
- Title
- The Future of Software Quality Assurance
- Author
- Stephan Goericke
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland AG
- Location
- Cham
- Date
- 2020
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-030-29509-7
- Size
- 15.5 x 24.1 cm
- Pages
- 276
- Category
- Informatik