Page - 314 - in Universities in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 - A Social History of a Multilingual Space

314 ♦  Universities in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 See Übersicht der akademischen Behörden, der den einzelnen Fakultäten zugehörenden Decane, Pro­ Decane, Professoren, Privatdocenten . . . dann der Kirche, Bibliothek, Kanzlei, Quästur an der Kaiserl. Königl. Universität zu Wien für das Studien­ Jahr 1860/61 (Vienna: Kaiserlich-königliche Staats- Druckerei, 1861), and Personalstand der k.k. Universität zu Prag zu Anfang des Winter­ Semesters 1860–61 (Prague: k.k. Normalschulbuchdruckerei, 1860). 104. Krzysztofa Michalewska, “Habilitacje w Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim 1848– 1918,” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego: Prace Historyczne 71, no. 12 (1963): 79–80. 105. It was, once again, Šafárik who mediated between the ministry and the univer- sity to achieve the appointment of another Czech patriot. See Otakar Brázda, “Přichod Jana Evangelisty Purkyně na pražskou univerzitu,” AUC­ HUCP 27, no. 1 (1987): 55–89; and AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 1210, PA Purkyne, proposition of the faculty N. 973, 27 September 1849, ministry’s pro- posal Z. 7164/970, 22 October 1849. 106. AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 1209, PA Jaksch, Z. 2935/383, 28 May 1849. 107. See, for example, the argument in AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 1186, PA Dietl, Z. 168, 10 February 1851, in which scholars who did not know Polish were not considered, even if they had greater scholarly achievements. 108. Mrozowska, “Okres ucisku,” 219. In 1850 Nikodem Bętkowski, the author of the first Polish textbook for pathological anatomy, strove for the chair and was proposed by the faculty, but without result; the same problem was encountered in the history of medicine, as all candidates were rejected by the ministry. See AUJ, S II 810, 20 March 1850; 22 October 1850 (for pathological anatomy); and AUJ, WL II 156 (for the history of medicine). 109. For Kozubowski, see AUJ, S II 808, 19 October 1854, Z. 25543; for Majer, see AUJ, S II 815, 13 June 1856, Z. 11235; AGAD, MWiO, Sygn. 51u, PA Mayer, Z. 13995, 616, 9 March 1856. 110. Stefan Berger and Christoph Conrad, eds., The Past as History: National Identities and Historical Consciousness in Modern Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 163. 111. In Prague the imperial-Catholic school of Václav Vladivoj Tomek competed with the positivist-internationalist school of Jaroslav Goll. See, for instance, Bohumil Jiroušek, “Mimořádná profesura Josefa Pekaře (ve světle vztahů Antonína Rezka a Jaroslava Golla),” in Proměny elit v moderní době, ed. Milena Lenderová, Zdeněk Bezecný, and Jiří Kubeš (České Budějovice: Historický ústav Jihočeské univerzity, 2003), 167–78. On the Cracow school of historiography, which is still controversial, see, for instance, Andrzej Wierzbicki, “Wokół ‘czarnej legendy’ historiografii krakowskich konserwatystów,” Kwartalnik Historyczny 104, no. 2 (1997): 63–87; and Henryk Słoczyński, “Z dziejów czarnej legendy krakow- skiej historiografii konserwatywnej: Józef Szujski w opiniach współczesnych i potomnych,” Kwartalnik Historyczny 102, nos. 3–4 (1995): 209–44. 112. See Vatroslav Jagić, “A Survey of Slavistic Studies,” Slavonic Review 1,