Page - 316 - in Universities in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 - A Social History of a Multilingual Space

316 ♦  Universities in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 1907), 134–48. See also Christine Ottner-Diesenberger, “Joseph Chmel und Johann Friedrich Böhmer: Die Anfänge der Regesta Imperii im Spannungsfeld von Freundschaft und Wissenschaft,” in Wege zur Urkunde, Wege der Urkunde, Wege der Forschung, ed. Karel Hruza and Paul Herold (Vienna: Böhlau, 2005), 257–91. 126. Jiří Rak, “Obraz Němce v české historiografii 19. století,” in Obraz Němců, Rakouska a Německa v české společnosti 19. a 20. století, ed. Jan Křen and Eva Broklová (Prague: Karolinum, 1998), 49–75, esp. 57–59. 127. See the wording in the nomination act for Antoni Wacholz: AGAD, MWiO, Sygn. 117u, PA Wacholz, Z. 1190, 4 January 1850. 128. See the negative description of Walewski by the faculty of the university in AUJ, WF II 135, Bericht der Kommission aus 9.8.1850. 129. For an example of the discourse on Walewski, see Krzysztof Baczkowski, “W służbie dworu Habsburskiego: Antoni Walewski (1805–1876),” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego: Prace Historyczne 132 (2005): 99–108, where, as in other literature quoted in the article, the idea that Walewski was a Habsburg secret agent is based on allegations of the time. 130. See also AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 1221, PA Tomek, Z. 7547/838, 25 September 1850. 131. Großdeutsch refers to the “Great German” solution of restructuring the German Confederation into a national state, including Habsburg regions that were either populated by Germans or seen as belonging historically to them. Höfler is regarded as one of the leading writers of the first generation; see Thomas Brechenmacher, Großdeutsche Geschichtsschreibung im neunzehnten Jahrhundert: Die erste Generation (1830–48) (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996). 132. AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 1217, PA Höfler, Z. 9331/884, 17 September 1851. On Tomek’s influence, see Blanka Zilynská, “Karl Adolf Constantin Ritter von Höfler jako univerzitní učitel,” in Německá medievistika v českých zemích do roku 1945, ed. Pavel Soukup and František Šmahel (Prague: Výzkumné centrum pro dějiny vědy, 2004), 201–2. 133. Zilynská, “Karl Adolf Constantin Ritter von Höfler,” 202; and Karl Adolf Constantin Höfler and Paul Joseph Šafařík, Glagolitische Fragmente (Prague: Gottlieb Haase Söhne, 1857). 134. Peter Morée, “Jan Hus as a Threat to the German Future in Central Europe: The Bohemian Reformer in the Controversy between Constantin Höfler and František Palacký,” in The Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice, ed. Zdenek V. David and David R. Holeton (Prague: Main Library, 2002), 4:295–307. 135. See the appointment records of Hermann Bonitz in Vienna, AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 664, PA Bonitz, Z. 377/72, 16 January 1849. 136. AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 1218, PA Lange, Z. 17544/13191, 7 January 1855. 137. See Leitner, “Das Reformerwerk.” 138. Schneider, “Briefe,” for example, 237–38.