Page - 351 - in Universities in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 - A Social History of a Multilingual Space

Notes to Chapter 5 ♦  351 percent were appointed to other universities during their careers (the categories are nonexclusive). In L’viv almost half of the scholars who habilitated there remained Privatdozenten, while 40 percent were appointed associate professors, 25 percent became full professors, and 14 percent moved to other academic insti- tutions (including universities) (again the categories are nonexclusive). Apart from the low number of scholars not progressing above Privatdozenten, medical faculties demonstrated a similar distribution. 76. See the police reports and political decisions: DALO, F. 26, Op. 5, Spr. 437, pp. 42–50, 18 March 1867; Z. 554, 29 January 1867; N. 139, 16 April 1868; and the faculty’s claim of Holovac’kyj’s innocence: AGAD, MWiO, Sygn. 117u, PA Głowacki, Z. 4473, 1 June 1868. On later repercussions, see DALO, F. 26, Op. 5, Spr. 437, p. 55, 6 August 1869. See also, among recent publications on this widely researched topic, Włodzimierz Osadczy, Święta Ruś: Rozwój i oddziaływanie idei prawosławia w Galicji (Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie- Skłodowskiej, 2007), 142–54. 77. Wincenty Pol to the philosophical faculty of the Jagiellonian University, AGAD, MWiO, Sygn. 393u, Próba restytuowania W. Pola na katedrę geografii, 18 December 1869. 78. From the opinion the provincial governor on the question, AGAD, MWiO, Sygn. 393u, Z. 1058, 7 May 1870. 79. See the letter of Henryk Niewęgłowski in DALO, F. 26, Op. 7, Spr. 146, p. 108, 20 August 1871. 80. On the practice and rhetorics of Galician provincial autonomy, notwithstand- ing the lack of a legal basis, see Harald Binder, “ ‘Galizische Autonomie’: Ein streitbarer Begriff und seine Karriere,” in Moravské vyrovnání z roku 1905: Možnosti a limity národnostního smíru ve střední Evropě / Der Mährische Ausgleich von 1905: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen für einen nationalen Ausgleich in Mitteleuropa, ed. Lukáš Fasora (Brno: Matice Moravská pro Výzkumné Středisko pro Dějiny Střední Evropy: Prameny, Země, Kultura, 2006), 239–66. 81. See, for example, Henryk Barycz, “Docenckie kłopoty Józefa Szujskiego,” in Wśród gawędziarzy, pamiętnikarzy i uczonych galicyjskich: Studia i sylwety z Życia umysłowego Galicji XIX w., ed. Henryk Barycz (Cracow: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1963), 91–111. In this chapter Barycz uses the phrase “older genera- tion” as a pejorative to describe those with etatist and loyal leanings. 82. AGAD, MWiO, Sygn. 121u, PA Sobel, Z. 192, 26 January 1884. 83. AGAD, MWiO, Sygn. 119u, PA Kawczyński, Z. 222, 26 January 1884. 84. Maria Julita Nedza, Polityka Stypendialna Akademii Umiejętności w Latach 1878–1920: Fundacje Gałęzowskiego, Pileckiego i Osławskiego (Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk, 1973), 91. 85. Only a few candidates sought to achieve habilitation in this subject but were rejected: Albert Zipper in 1881 and Napthali Sobel in 1884, both in L’viv. Zipper was a translator and later authored Polish-German dictionaries (Langenscheidt, among others); for his unsuccessful habilitation, see AGAD, MWiO, Sygn. 122u,