Page - 302 - in VULNERABLE - The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
Image of the Page - 302 -
Text of the Page - 302 -
VULNERABLE302
international law, it appears that it would be only in exceptional cir-
cumstances, none of which have been identified by the committee,
that the right to return could possibly be legally limited in ordinary
times.7
One legally possible justification for states to obstruct the exer-
cise of the right to return is through the derogation clause found at
Article 4(1) of the ICCPR. This article permits states parties to dero-
gate temporarily from some of their ICCPR obligations in times of
public emergency. It reads as follows:
In time of public emergency which threatens the life of the nation
and the existence of which is officially proclaimed, the States Parties
to the present Covenant may take measures derogating from
their obligations under the present Covenant to the extent strictly
required by the exigencies of the situation, provided that such
measures are not inconsistent with their other obligations under
international law and do not involve discrimination solely on the
ground of race, colour, sex, language, religion or social origin.8
As Sarah Joseph notes, this provision is not a âblank cheque.â9
Derogations measures are only permitted in extreme circumstances
and must be proportionate and consistent with other international
human rights obligations. Furthermore, there are rights (listed in
Article 4(2)) from which a state may never derogate.10 Finally, the state
7. The Travaux Préparatoires to the ICCPR reveal that the only limitation on this
right, expressed with the word âarbitrarily,â was intended to apply exclusively
to cases of lawful exile as punishment for a crime, whether accompanied by a
revocation of citizenship or not. However, in its concluding observations on
the Dominican Republic, the UNHRC stated in 1993 that âpunishment by exile
is not compatible with the Covenant.â See Sara Joseph & Melissa Castan, The
Â
InternationalÂ
CovenantÂ
onÂ
CivilÂ
andÂ
PoliticalÂ
Rights, 3rd ed (Oxford: Oxford Univer-
sity Press, 2013). See also: Marc J Bossuyt, GuideÂ
toÂ
theÂ
âTravauxÂ
PrĂ©paratoiresâÂ
ofÂ
theÂ
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers, 1987), at 260-63; Manfred Nowak, UN Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights:Â CCPRÂ Commentary (Kehl & Rhein, Germany: NP Engel, 1993) at 219.
8. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, GA Res 2200A (XXI), 21
UNGAOR, Supp No 16, UN Doc A/6316 (1966) at 52.
9. Sarah Joseph, âA Timeline of COVID 19 and Human Rights: Derogations in Time
of Public Emergencyâ, Griffith News (5 May 2020), online: <news.griffith.edu.
au/2020/05/05/a-timeline-of-covid-19-and-human-rights-derogations-in-time-of-
public-emergency>.
10. These are the right to life, the prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman,
or degrading treatment or punishment, the prohibition of slavery and servitude,
VULNERABLE
The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Title
- VULNERABLE
- Subtitle
- The Law, Policy and Ethics of COVID-19
- Authors
- Vanessa MacDonnell
- Jane Philpott
- Sophie Thériault
- Sridhar Venkatapuram
- Publisher
- Ottawa Press
- Date
- 2020
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- ISBN
- 9780776636429
- Size
- 15.2 x 22.8 cm
- Pages
- 648
- Categories
- Coronavirus
- International