Seite - 317 - in Universities in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 - A Social History of a Multilingual Space

Notes to Chapter 2 ♦  317 139. See August Schleicher, Die Formenlehre der kirchenslawischen Sprache, erklärend und vergleichend dargestellt (Bonn: H. B. König, 1852). 140. Georg Curtius, Die Sprachvergleichung in ihrem Verhältniss zur classischen Philologie, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Wilhelm Besser, 1848), 9. 141. Ludwig Lange, Die klassische Philologie in ihrer Stellung zum Gesammtgebiete der Wissenschaften und in ihrer inneren Gliederung: Eine Antrittsvorlesung, gehalten am 24. April 1855 in Prag (Prague: Calve, 1855), 10. 142. Most notably in the case of Małecki, in his nomination to the L’viv chair of Polish language and literature, according to Finkel. Finkel, “Historya Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego,” 334–35. 143. See, e.g., on Mychajlo Lučkay’s and Josyp Levyc’kyj’s proposals of Old Church Slavic Ruthenian as opposed to vernaculars, Andrii Danylenko, “Myxajlo Luckaj: A Dissident Forerunner of Literary Rusyn?,” Slavonic and East European Review 87, no. 2 (2009): 201–26; and Michael’ Mozer [Michael Moser], “Josyf Levyc’kyj jak borec’ za kul’turu ‘ruskoï’ (ukraïns’koï) movy,” in Confraternitas: Jobilejnyj zbirnyk na počanu Jaroslava Isajevyča, ed. Mykola Krykun and Ostap Sereda (L’viv: Instytut ukraïnoznavstva im. I. Kryp’jakevyča Nacional’na Akademiya Nauk Ukraïny, 2007), 447–60. 144. See Zdeněk Šamberger, “Časopis Vídeňský Denník a jeho poslání v letech 1850–1851 (Ke ztroskotanému pokusu Leo Thuna o založení české konzerva- tivní strany),” Slovanský přehled 71, no. 1 (1985): 26–40; Mile Mamić, “Das deutsch-slawische Wörterbuch der juridisch-politischen Terminologie (seine Konzeption und Realisierung),” in Balten—Slaven—Deutsche: Aspekte und Perspektiven kultureller Kontakte. Festschrift für Friedrich Scholz zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Ulrich Obst and Gerhard Ressel (Münster: Lit, 1999), 131–38; and Kamiš, “Tschechisch-deutsche Beziehungen.” 145. Mychajlo Kril’, “Nevidomi lysty Ivana Holovac‘koho do Antona Petruševyča,” Ukraïna moderna 2–3 (1999): 350–53. Mychaĭlo Vozniak sees the Ministry of the Interior as the responsible and financing body. Mychajlo Voznjak [Mychaĭlo Vozniak], “Z-za redakcijnych kulis videns’koho Vistnyka ta Zori Halyc’koï,” Zapysky Naukovoho Tovarystva imeny Ševčenka 107 (1912): 73–109. 146. Kořalka, František Palacký, 340–44. Thun-Hohenstein appointed Vocel (Wocel) in early 1850 as associate professor of Bohemian archaeology and history of art in Prague. AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 1221, PA Wocel, Z. 273/47, 30 January 1850. 147. On Hattala, see Wilhelm Zeil, Slawistik an der deutschen Universität in Prag (1882–1945) (Munich: Otto Sagner, 1995), 26. 148. DALO, F. 26, Op. 5, Spr. 437, PA Glowacki. Holovac’kyj’s appointment as an auxiliary professor (supplent) was announced on 27 November 1848, that as a full professor on 13 December 1848; on his pay, see petitions for adjustments in the personnel records and payment list in DALO, F. 26, Op. 7, Spr. 33, list for 1854/55. 149. For one interpretation of the political contacts and problems of the professor of Polish language and literature Jan Szlachtowski, dismissed from the University