Seite - 370 - in Universities in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 - A Social History of a Multilingual Space

370 ♦  Universities in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 136. Albin Lesky, “Gomperz, Theodor,” Neue Deutsche Biographie, ed. Historische Kommission bei der Bayrischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1964), 6:641–42. 137. For the metaphor, see Arthur Mahler, Rede gehalten in der Universitäts­ Debatte zum Dringlichkeitsantrag Prof. Masaryk’s im oesterreichischen Abgeordnetenhaus, am 3. Dezember 1907 (Vienna: Unitas, 1908). 138. AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 1070, PA Brunner, Z. 28381, 12 September 1902. 139. AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 920, PA Kreiblich, Z. 1518, 13 February 1903. 140. AT-OeStA/AVA Unterricht UM allg. Akten 920, PA Löwi, Z. 4944, 16 October 1909. 141. Oliver Rathkolb, “Gewalt und Antisemitismus an der Universität Wien,” in Rathkolb, Der lange Schatten, 69–92. 142. Josef Redlich, speech in the Lower House of Parliament, 4 December 1907, reprinted in Stenographische Protokolle 1907, 2941. At the Viennese medical faculty, for example, from the 1880s on, more than eighty scholars were titular associate professors, and of these, thirty were later promoted to associate pro- fessor, but only six ultimately became full professors (up to 1918). In contrast, in Prague most titular associate professors were later promoted; in Graz seven out of twenty-three were promoted; and in Galicia and at the Czech University in Prague, most scholars having the title of professor were later appointed pro- fessors. Confessional disparities in promotions are, however, not known. 143. Eugen Ehrlich, “Der Antisemitismus im Professorenkollegium der öster- reichischen Universität,” Dr. Bloch’s Österreichische Wochenschrift, 6 December 1907, 811–12. 144. On the mechanism of this, see Shulamit Volkov, “Soziale Ursachen des Erfolgs in der Wissenschaft—Juden im Kaiserreich,” Historische Zeitschrift 245, no. 2 (1987): 315–42. For the process in Vienna, see Karl Schorske, Fin­ de­ Siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture (New York: Knopf, 1980). Chapter 7 1. Karl Popper, “Prague Lecture,” 25 May 1994, https://www.lf3.cuni.cz/3LFEN-255 .html. 2. On the Austria-rootedness of Popper’s theories, see Malachi Haim Hacohen, Karl Popper, the Formative Years, 1902–1945: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002); like most historians of philosophy, Hacohen writes of the “Austrian tradition,” by which he actually means the Habsburg Empire. 3. See the overview in Adam Kożuchowski, The Afterlife of Austria­ Hungary: The