Page - 117 - in Loss and Damage from Climate Change - Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
Image of the Page - 117 -
Text of the Page - 117 -
5 Attribution:HowIs ItRelevant forLoss… 117
Box5.1KeyMessages
• In the political context of climate negotiations, questions aboutwhether losses and
damagescanbeattributedtoanthropogenicclimatechangeareoftenlinkedtoissues
of responsibility, blame, and liability.
• Attribution science does not aim to establish responsibility or blame, but rather to
investigatedriversof change.
• Attributionscience isadvancingrapidly,andhaspotential to increaseunderstanding
ofhowclimatevariabilityandchangeis influencingslowonsetandextremeweather
events, and how this interactswith other drivers of risk, including socio-economic
drivers, to influence lossesanddamages.
• Over time, someuncertainties in the sciencewill be reduced, as the anthropogenic
climatechangesignalbecomesstronger,andunderstandingofclimatevariabilityand
changedevelops.
• However, someuncertaintieswill not be eliminated.Uncertainty is common in sci-
ence, anddoesnotpreventuseful applications inpolicy,butmightdeterminewhich
applicationsareappropriate.It is importanttohighlightthat inattributionstudies, the
strength of evidence varies substantially betweendifferent kinds of slowonset and
extremeweather events, andbetween regions. Policy-makers shouldnot expect the
lateremergenceofconclusiveevidenceabout theinfluenceofclimatevariabilityand
changeon specific incidences of losses anddamages; and, in particular, shouldnot
expect the strengthofevidence tobeequalbetweenevents, andbetweencountries.
• Rather thanwaiting for furtherconfidence inattributionstudies, there ispotential to
startworkingnowtointegratescienceintopolicyandpractice,tohelpunderstandand
tackledriversof lossesanddamages, informingprevention, recovery, rehabilitation,
and transformation.
Section5.2 summarisesfindings fromour transdisciplinary researchofperspec-
tives on attribution inL&Dpolicydiscussions, drawingdirectly onqualitative evi-
dence from stakeholder interviews (see Box 5.2). Section 5.3 then provides an
overview of sources of evidence about attribution of L&D to climate variability
andanthropogenicclimatechange.This isnot restricted tophysicalclimatescience,
but also includes other fields of enquirywhich investigate causative links between
L&D,climate andweather, andhumanactivity.Section5.4will discuss if andhow
suchattributionsciencemightbeappliedtosupportL&Dpolicyandpractice, taking
intoaccountpreviousideasfromtheL&Dliterature,andstakeholder interviews(see
5.2), but also drawing on our own conclusions and ideas about potentially fruitful
applications.
Loss and Damage from Climate Change
Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
- Title
- Loss and Damage from Climate Change
- Subtitle
- Concepts, Methods and Policy Options
- Authors
- Reinhard Mechler
- Laurens M. Bouwer
- Thomas Schinko
- Swenja Surminski
- JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer
- Publisher
- Springer Open
- Date
- 2019
- Language
- English
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- ISBN
- 978-3-319-72026-5
- Size
- 16.0 x 24.0 cm
- Pages
- 580
- Keywords
- Environment, Climate change, Environmental law, Environmental policy, Risk management
- Categories
- International
- Naturwissenschaften Umwelt und Klima