Page - 35 - in Radical Solutions and Open Science - An Open Approach to Boost Higher Education

36 C.M.Stracke Stracke, C. M. (2018b). Como a Educação Aberta pode melhorar a qualidade de aprendiza- gem e produzir impacto em alunos, organizações e na sociedade? [ How can Open Edu- cation improve learning quality and achieve impact for learners, organizations and in soci- ety?] In M. Duran, T. Amiel, & C. Costa (Eds.), Utopias and Distopias da Tecnologia na Educação a Distância e Aberta (pp. 499–545). Campinas: & Niterói: UNICAMP & UFF. Retrieved from http://opening-up.education/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Stracke_2018_ Educacao_Aberta_Qualidade_Impacto.pdf. Stracke,C.M.(2019).Qualityframeworksandlearningdesignforopeneducation.TheInternational ReviewofResearchinOpenandDistributedLearning,20(2),180–203.https://doi.org/10.19173/ irrodl.v20i2.4213. Therrien, W. J., & Cook, B. G. (2018). Null effects and publication bias in learning disabili- ties research.LearningDisabilitiesResearch&Practice,33,5–10.https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp. 12163. UNESCO. (2019a). Draft recommendation on open educational resources. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370936?posInSet=22&queryId=304ed6aa- 5635-4d73-aefd-92ed93ae3c48. UNESCO. (2019b). UNESCO recommendation on open educational resources. 40 C/32 Annex.Paris:UNESCO.Retrieved fromhttp://opening-up.education/wp-content/uploads/2019/ 12/RECOMMENDATION-CONCERNING-OPEN-EDUCATIONAL-RESOURCES.pdf. vanderZee,T.,&Reich, J. (2018).Openeducation science.AERA Open, 4(3), 1–15. https://doi. org/10.1177/2332858418787466. Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1745691617751884. Vicente-Saez,R.,&Martinez-Fuentes,C.(2018).Opensciencenow:Asystematicliteraturereview foran integrateddefinition.JournalofBusinessResearch,88,428–436.https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusres.2017.12.043. Vision,T. J. (2010).Opendata and the social contract of scientificpublishing.BioScience, 60(5), 330–331.https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.5.2. vonHippel, E. (2005).Democratizing innovation. The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft,55(1), 63–78. Wicherts, J.M. (2017). Theweak spots in contemporary science (andhow tofix them).Animals, 7(12), 90.https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7120090. Wicherts, J.M.,Veldkamp,C.L.,Augusteijn,H.E.,Bakker,M.,VanAert,R.,&VanAssen,M.A. (2016).Degreesoffreedominplanning,running,analyzing,andreportingpsychologicalstudies: Achecklist to avoidp-hacking.Frontiers in Psychology, 7,1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg. 2016.01832. Wilkinson,M. D., Dumontier,M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton,M., Baak, A., et al. (2016).TheFAIRguidingprinciples for scientificdatamanagement and stewardship.Scientific Data, 3,160018.https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18. Willinsky, J. (2005, August 1). The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday, 10(8). Retrieved from https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/ fm/article/view/1265/1185. Huebner, G. M., Nicolson, M. L., Fell, M. J., Kennard, H., Elam, S., Hanmer, C., … Shipworth, D. (2017). Are we heading towards a replicability crisis in energy effi- ciency research? A toolkit for improving the quality, transparency and replicability of energy efficiency impact evaluations. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/71e4/ fde85949cf5f2d803657d6becfb080be1a57.pdf. Ziman, J. (1994).Prometheus bound. Science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge:Cambridge UniversityPress. Ziman, J. (2000).Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press.