Web-Books
in the Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Informatik
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Page - 92 -
  • User
  • Version
    • full version
    • text only version
  • Language
    • Deutsch - German
    • English

Page - 92 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Image of the Page - 92 -

Image of the Page - 92 - in Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies

Text of the Page - 92 -

Energies2019,12, 57 systemreliabilitywasbetter thanthehouseandthelaboratoryloadsat thisstep,becausetheofficeload profilewasbasicallysynchronizedwith the irradiationandwindcurvesandthesolarenergycouldbe useddirectly tosupply the loads. Therefore,weomittedStep3 that representedtheoptimizationwith w=2andLPSP=0inTables5and6. ȱ (a)ȱwȱ=ȱ2ȱandȱ(SOClow,ȱSOChigh)ȱ=ȱ(40%,ȱ50%)ȱ (b)ȱwȱ=ȱ0ȱandȱ(SOClow,ȱSOChigh)ȱ=ȱ(30%,ȱ40%)ȱ Figure8.Thereferenceplots for theoffice load. Table7.Theoptimaldesignprocedures for theoffice load. (b,s,w) (SOClow,SOChigh) LPSP (%) J ($/kWh) Step1 (8,10,2) (40%,50%) 5.08% 1.107 Step2 (23,11,2) (40%,50%) 0% 1.106 Step3 - - - - Step4 (29,17,0) (40%,50%) 0% 0.818 Step5 (29,17,0) (30%,40%) 0% 0.817 Step6 (26,17,0) (30%,40%) 0% 0.791 Step7 (26,17,0) (30%,40%) 0% 0.791 Optimal (26,17,0) (30%,40%) 0% 0.791 Settingw=0gaveasignificantcost reductionto J=0.818$/kWhwithLPSP=0bysetting(b, s,w) = (29, 17, 0) (seeStep4ofTable7). The iterativeprocedures then further improvedthesystemcost to J=0.817$/kWhwithLPSP=0byadjustingthepowermanagementas (SOClow,SOChigh)= (30%, 40%),andthecostfinallyconvergedto J=0.791$/kWhwithLPSP=0bysetting(b, s,w)= (26,17,0) and(SOClow,SOChigh)= (30%,40%).Whencomparedwith theoriginalcost, thecostwasreducedby 28.6%whilemaintainingcompletesystemreliability. 3.4. Cost andEnergyDistributions Theoptimal systemdesigns for the three loads,basedonthereferenceplots, are illustrated in Tables5–7.Wefurtheranalyzedthecostandenergydistributionsof thesesystems,asshowninTable8. First, thelaboratoryachievedthelowestunitenergycostbecauseitsaveragedailyenergyconsumption was the largest; therefore, the initial costswereshared. Thehousehold loadshowedanopposite result. Second, thelaboratoryusedthemostsolarpanelsandbatteries,whilethehouseholdappliedthefewest solarpanels andbatteries, toproduceandstore sufficient energy for the loadrequirements. Third, theoptimalbatteryunits forall loadsdidnotdiffermuch(23–27units); thiswasnot intuitivebecause the laboratory loadwasmainlyatnight,while theoffice loadwasmainly indaytime. Thereasonfor thiswas that thebattery lifewas shortened if onlya small amountof thebatteryenergywasused. Therefore, using a large amount of the battery energy increased the initial cost but it also helped toextend thebattery life, thereby reducing thebattery costs. For instance, for the laboratory load, thebatterycostwas the lowesteven thoughthe laboratory loadusedthe largestamountofbattery energy. Because the initial batterySOCwasset as80%in the simulationmodel, anegativeenergy supplydistributionofbatterymeans thebatterySOCishigher than80%at theendof thesimulation, 92
back to the  book Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies"
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Title
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies
Authors
Wei-Chiang Hong
Ming-Wei Li
Guo-Feng Fan
Editor
MDPI
Location
Basel
Date
2019
Language
English
License
CC BY 4.0
ISBN
978-3-03897-583-0
Size
17.0 x 24.4 cm
Pages
448
Keywords
Scheduling Problems in Logistics, Transport, Timetabling, Sports, Healthcare, Engineering, Energy Management
Category
Informatik
Web-Books
Library
Privacy
Imprint
Austria-Forum
Austria-Forum
Web-Books
Short-Term Load Forecasting by Artificial Intelligent Technologies