Page - 304 - in Soziale Netzwerke und gesundheitliche Ungleichheiten - Eine neue Perspektive für die Forschung

304 M. Gamper et al. Kuhlmann, E. (2016). Gendersensible Perspektiven auf Gesundheit und Gesundheits- versorgung. In M. Richter & K. Hurrelmann (Hrsg.), Soziologie von Gesundheit und Krankheit (S. 183–196). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Lampert, T., Hoebel, J., Kuntz, B., Müters, S., & Kroll, L. E. (2017), Gesundheit- liche Ungleichheit in verschiedenen Lebensphasen. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Gesundheits- berichterstattung/GBEDownloadsB/gesundheitliche_ungleichheit_lebensphasen.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. März 2019. Lange, C., Manz, K., & Kuntz, B. (2017). Alkoholkonsum bei Erwachsenen in Deutsch- land: Riskante Trinkmengen. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/ Gesundheitsberichterstattung/GBEDownloadsJ/FactSheets/JoHM_2017_02_Alkohol- konsum_Erwachsene.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. März 2019. Lee, G. R., DeMaris, A., Bavin, S., & Sullivan, R. (2001). Gender differences in the depressive effect of widowhood in later life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 56(1), S56–S61. Lenz, K. (2003). Zur Geschlechtstypik persönlicher Beziehungen – Eine Einführung. In K. Lenz (Hrsg.), Frauen und Männer. Zur Geschlechtstypik persönlicher Beziehungen (S. 7–51). Weinheim: Juventa. Lepore, S. J. (1992). Social conflict, social support, and psychological distress: Evidence of cross-domain buffering effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 857–867. Lin, N. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6), 785–795. Lubbers, M. J., & Snijders, T. A. (2007). A comparison of various approaches to the expo- nential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Social Networks, 29(4), 489–507. Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 86–101. Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122–131. Martin, C. L., Kornienko, O., Schaefer, D. R., Hanish, L. D., Fabes, R. A., & Goble, P. (2013). The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children’s peer affiliative networks: A longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. Child Develop- ment, 84(3), 921–937. McGuire, G. M. (2000). Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees’ network members. Work and Occupations, 27(4), 501–524. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Vertiainen, E., & de Vries, H. (2010). Smo- king-based selection and influence in gender-segregated friendship networks: A social network analysis of adolescent smoking. Addiction, 105(7), 1280–1289. Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon. Monserud, M. A., & Wong, R. (2015). Depressive symptoms among older Mexicans: The role of widowhood, gender, and social integration. Research on Aging, 37(8), 856–886. Moore, G. (1990). Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. Ame- rican Sociological Review, 55(5), 726–735.